What is the general formula for solving polynomial series?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter johann1301h
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The general formula for solving the polynomial series 3, 7, 12, 18, 25 is derived as F(n) = n(n + 5) / 2. Initial attempts using x(n) = 3 + 4n were incorrect due to the linear nature of the function, which did not match the quadratic pattern of the series. The correct approach involves recognizing the second difference as constant, leading to the quadratic formula u(n) = (1/2)n² + (5/2)n. This method aligns with the properties of quadratic series and can be generalized for similar sequences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial series and quadratic functions
  • Familiarity with difference analysis in sequences
  • Basic knowledge of recursive formulas
  • Experience with mathematical induction and summation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quadratic series and their applications
  • Learn about difference analysis techniques for sequences
  • Explore recursive formula derivations in mathematical sequences
  • Investigate the use of mathematical induction in proving series formulas
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students engaged in polynomial analysis, sequence theory, and those seeking to deepen their understanding of quadratic functions and series.

johann1301h
Messages
71
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am trying to solve this series generally:

the series: 3 7 12 18 25.

i tried using x(n) = 3 + 4n.

But this doesn't work.. Please help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
johann1301h said:
Hi, I am trying to solve this series generally:

the series: 3 7 12 18 25.

i tried using x(n) = 3 + 4n.

But this doesn't work.. Please help.

I would add ##0## at the beginning and see whether that helps.
 
Calculate how much the numbers increase in each step. That should lead to some pattern.
 
johann1301h said:
Hi, I am trying to solve this series generally:

the series: 3 7 12 18 25.

i tried using x(n) = 3 + 4n.

But this doesn't work.. Please help.
Did you try graphing it?
When I graphed your series of numbers, I got a curve.
That implied to me, that "4n", being a linear function, was not correct.
 
You must find ##f(n)## such that ##a_{n+1}=f(n)+a_{n}## with ##a_{0}=3##, hint: think simple!
Ssnow
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aufbauwerk 2045
Most sequences can be resolve using difference (not differential) analysis.

Code:
 3 
 7    4  
12    5    1
18    6    1
25    7    1
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aufbauwerk 2045
Just stumbled across this page. I'm doing independent math research and the series you are inquiring about is a smaller part of what I am doing. The formula you are looking for is F(n)= n(n+5) / 2 = {3,7,12,18,25,...}. It is similar to the formula for triangular numbers T(n) = n(n+1)/2 = {1,3,6,10,15,...}. Hope this helps!

Regards,
David
 
Difference between two numbers is (2+n), so you can write x(n)= (2+n) + x(n-1) when n > 1.

This is a recursive formula, that also can be written out as:
x(n) = (2+n) + (2+n-1) + (2+n-2) + (2+n-3) + ... + x(1)

Recognizing the pattern as:
x(n) = x(1) + \sum_{i=2}^n(2+i) = x(1) - 3 + \sum_{i=1}^n(2+i) = \sum_{i=1}^n2+ \sum_{i=1}^ni = 2n+ n(n+1)/2 = n(n+5)/2

So we find x(n) = n(n+5)/2.

\sum_{i=1}^nn = n(n+1)/2 can be found from a table or WolframAlpha(or could also derivated without too much trouble) :)
 
Type out math instead of posting images.
IMG_20200218_223414.jpg
 
  • #10
This is not necessarily a better method, since yours is actually probably faster in this case, however any series with a constant second difference is called a quadratic series and can be generalised as such:

##u_{n} = an^{2} + bn + c##

First term: ##u_{1} = a + b + c##
First difference: ##u_{n} - u_{n-1} = 2an + (b-a)##
Second difference: ##(u_{n} - u_{n-1}) - (u_{n-1} - u_{n-2}) = 2a##

So in the case of the sequence ##3,7,12,18,25...## we can write down three relations

##a + b + c = 3##
##3a + b = 4##
##2a = 1##

Which gives ##a = \frac{1}{2}, b = \frac{5}{2}, c= 0##, so

##u_{n} = \frac{1}{2}n^{2} + \frac{5}{2}n##

which is the answer you obtained.
 
  • #11
More generally it's easy to check by induction that $$\sum_{n=1}^{a} n (n + 1) (n + 2) \dotsm (n + p - 1) = \frac{a (a + 1) \dotsm (a + p)}{p + 1} \,.$$ The relation can be be seen as the discrete analogue of $$\int_{0}^{a} \mathrm{d}x \, x^{p} = \frac{a^{p+1}}{p + 1}$$ and it can be used to determine the partial sum of any polynomial. For example, $$\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum_{n=1}^{a} n^{3} &=& \sum_{n=1}^{a} \bigl( n - 3 n (n + 1) + n (n + 1) (n + 2) \bigr) \\
&=& \frac{1}{2} a (a + 1) - 3 \frac{1}{3} a (a + 1) (a + 2) + \frac{1}{4} a (a + 1) (a + 2) (a + 3) \\
&=&\frac{1}{4} a^{2} (a + 1)^{2} \,.
\end{eqnarray*}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K