What is the general solution for the power series in Calculus 2?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the general solution for power series in the context of calculus, specifically focusing on the geometric series and its applications. Participants explore various methods to derive coefficients in power series expansions and address related mathematical concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference the geometric series and exponential series as foundational examples for understanding power series.
  • One participant derives the series expansion for $\frac{1}{1-(-3x)}$ and discusses the implications for the value of $a_3$.
  • Another participant questions the interpretation of $0^0$ in the context of the series when $x=0$.
  • A participant provides a detailed derivation of coefficients $a_n$ for the series expansion, leading to specific values for $a_2$, $a_3$, and $a_4$ based on manipulations of the series.
  • Some participants propose an intuitive approach to derive coefficients by equating terms in the series expansion, leading to a general formula for $a_n$.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and interpretations, with no consensus reached on a single approach or solution. Multiple competing views on the derivation of coefficients and the implications of certain mathematical conventions remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the need for suitable conditions such as the radius of convergence for their derivations, and some mention the importance of treating $0$ as a special case in certain mathematical contexts.

joku1234
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
please help!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-04-12 at 5.26.11 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-04-12 at 5.26.11 PM.png
    16.8 KB · Views: 124
Physics news on Phys.org
joku1234 said:
please help!

... wellcome on MHB joku1234!...

The regulations state that you've shown some effort to resolve questions ... to get the result you can refer to two standard examples: the geometric and exponential series ...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
joku1234 said:
please help!

(Wave)For your first question:We know that $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^n= \frac{1}{1-x}, \text{ for } |x|<1$Replacing $x$ with $-3x$ we get:

$$\frac{1}{1-(-3x)}=\frac{1}{1+3x}= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-3x)^n, \text{ for } |-3x|<1 \Rightarrow -1<3x<1 \Rightarrow \frac{-1}{3}<x< \frac{1}{3}$$
So what will be the value of $a_3$?
 
evinda said:
$$\frac{1}{1-(-3x)}=\frac{1}{1+3x}= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-3x)^n, \text{ for } |-3x|<1 \Rightarrow -1<3x<1 \Rightarrow \frac{-1}{3}<x< \frac{1}{3}$$

Doesn't that imply $$0^0=1$$ (if $$x=0$$)?
 
greg1313 said:
Doesn't that imply $$0^0=1$$ (if $$x=0$$)?

$0^0 = 1$ is a convention that allows us to extend definitions in different areas of mathematics that otherwise would require treating $0$ as a special case.
 
All the questions can be answered remembering the geometric series...

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{1 + \xi} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{n}\ \xi^{n},\ |\xi|< 1\ (1)$

Question 1: setting $\xi = 3\ x$ You have $\displaystyle \frac{2}{1 + 3\ x} = 2\ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{n}\ (3\ x)^{n} \implies a_{3} = - 54$...

Question 2 : from (1) You derive...

$\displaystyle \frac{d}{d \xi} \frac{1}{1 + \xi} = - \frac{1}{(1 + \xi)^{2}} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{n}\ n\ x^{n-1}\ (2)$

... and setting $\xi = 4\ x$ You have $\displaystyle \frac{x}{(1 + 4\ x)^{2}}= \ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{n}\ n\ 4^{n-1}\ x^{n} \implies a_{2} = 8$...

Question 3: from 1 You derive...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\xi} \frac{d t}{1 + t} = \ln (1 + \xi) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{n} \frac{\xi^{n+1}}{n+1}\ (3)$

... so that You have $\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x} \xi^{2}\ \ln (1 + \xi)\ d \xi = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{n} \frac{x^{n+4}}{(n+1)\ (n+4)} \implies a_{4} = \frac{1}{4}$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
Alternatively, for the first problem, an "intuitive" - but not rigorous - derivation is as follows. Suppose that the following holds (given suitable radius of convergence etc etc):
$$\frac{2}{1 + 3x} = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty a_n x^n = a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + \cdots$$
Then:
$$2 = (1 + 3x) \left ( a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + \cdots \right )$$
Distribute to get:
$$2 = \left ( a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + \cdots \right ) + 3x \left ( a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + \cdots \right ) = \left ( a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + \cdots \right ) + \left ( 3 a_0 x + 3 a_1 x^2 + 3 a_2 x^3 + \cdots \right )$$
Pairing up the coefficients of $x^n$ we get:
$$2 = a_0 + \left ( 3a_0 + a_1 \right ) x + \left ( 3a_1 + a_2 \right ) x^2 + \cdots$$
Or, more clearly:
$$2 + 0 x + 0 x^2 + \cdots = a_0 + \left ( 3a_0 + a_1 \right ) x + \left ( 3a_1 + a_2 \right ) x^2 + \cdots$$
Equate coefficients on both sides to find:
$$a_0 = 2$$
$$3a_0 + a_1 = 0 ~ ~ ~ \Rightarrow ~ ~ ~ a_1 = -3 a_0 = (-3) \times 2 = -6$$
$$3a_1 + a_2 = 0 ~ ~ ~ \Rightarrow ~ ~ ~ a_2 = -3 a_1 = (-3) \times (-6) = 18$$
$$3a_2 + a_3 = 0 ~ ~ ~ \Rightarrow ~ ~ ~ a_3 = -3 a_2 = (-3) \times 18 = -54$$
$$3a_3 + a_4 = 0 ~ ~ ~ \Rightarrow ~ ~ ~ a_4 = -3 a_3 = (-3) \times (-54) = 162$$
And so on. Eventually you find that $a_n = 2 \cdot (-3)^n$ as a general solution.

:D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K