What is the Impact of Imbalance Force on a Rotating Shaft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter minger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Shaft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the impact of imbalance forces on a rotating shaft, particularly in the context of rotordynamics and bearing research. The participant shares their steady-state response data, which reveals bearing loads significantly higher than previously analyzed. They confirm the use of the formula F = mrω² for calculating forces due to point imbalance and suggest an adjustment for couple imbalance using T = 2mrlω². This indicates a practical approach to estimating forces involved at various frequencies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotordynamics principles
  • Familiarity with bearing load analysis
  • Knowledge of frequency response in mechanical systems
  • Proficiency in applying Newton's laws of motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of F = mrω² in rotordynamic analysis
  • Explore the effects of couple imbalance on rotating shafts
  • Learn about advanced bearing load calculations and methodologies
  • Investigate frequency response analysis techniques in mechanical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, rotordynamic analysts, and researchers involved in bearing load assessments and vibration analysis of rotating machinery.

minger
Science Advisor
Messages
1,494
Reaction score
2
I'm doing some rotordynamic work with an outside guy is doing some bearing research for us. I sent him my steady-state response as a function of frequency, and he's almost taken aback by the bearing loads. He said that long ago he did the analysis with another engineer (no longer here) and they were an order of magnitude lower.

As a quick back-of-envelope, could I simply do:
<br /> F = mr\omega^2
To get an idea of the magnitude of forces involved at a frequency?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For a point imbalance. Sure. You can throw in a bit more realistic situation by making it a couple imbalance by just adjusting it to

T= 2mrl \omega^2
 
Good enough for me, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K