In Quantum mechanics books they usually first introduce a vector space called the ket-space and then associate using (Riesz representation theorem I believe) to each ket a corresponding element of the linear dual space.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Then they write the inner product of [itex]|x\rangle[/itex] and [itex]|y\rangle[/itex] (say) by calling on the dual to [itex]|x\rangle[/itex]:

[itex]\langle x | y\rangle[/itex].

There appears to be a flaw in the logic here. To employ the Riesz rep theorem we must already have knowledge of the inner product on the state space.

How is this inner product explicitly defined in QM?? I can't see it written anywhere in Sakurai.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# What is the inner product in state (ket/Hilbert) space.

Loading...

Similar Threads - inner product state | Date |
---|---|

A I'm getting the wrong inner product of Fock space | Jan 25, 2018 |

B Inner product of functions of continuous variable | Oct 21, 2017 |

I Inner products and adjoint operators | Apr 25, 2016 |

Inner product with maximally entangled state | Dec 14, 2011 |

Relation for Inner Product with States from a Complete Set | May 24, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**