What is the Integral of 1/x and its Relationship to ln(x)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DivergentSpectrum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the integral of 1/x and its relationship to the natural logarithm, ln(x). Participants explore the idea of using limits to derive ln(x) from the power rule, particularly focusing on the case where n approaches -1. There is debate over the validity of averaging two-sided limits, with some arguing that the limits do not exist individually, while others suggest that this method leads to a valid result. The conversation also touches on the lack of recognition for this limit definition in common resources like Wikipedia, and the mathematical beauty of the relationship between the integral and ln(x). Ultimately, the discussion highlights both the intrigue and complexity of defining ln(x) through limits and integrals.
  • #31
you can think of your limit as an average of
$$\dfrac{x^m-1}{m}\\
\text{and }\\
\dfrac{1-x^{-m}}{m}$$
one is and over estimate and one is an under estimate so the average is better than either
this is an example of estimating derivatives
where we have
$$\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{2h}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
lurflurf said:
you can think of your limit as an average of
$$\dfrac{x^m-1}{m}\\
\text{and }\\
\dfrac{1-x^{-m}}{m}$$
one is and over estimate and one is an under estimate so the average is better than either
this is an example of estimating derivatives
where we have
$$\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{2h}$$
ahh that makes sense. Funny how there can be so many interpretations of one thing
So I am guessing there must be a way to generalize limit formulas to an arbitrary order?
 
Last edited:
  • #33
I always found the relationship ## \int_1^x \frac{1}{x'}dx'=\ln x ## amazing. Think about it: The area under the function of inverse numbers from 1 to x tells you what exponent you have to use for e to get x. I also always wondered if there is a way to understand this more intuitively.
 
  • #34
this is an example of estimating derivatives
derivative of what?
Is it possible to take a limit and increase its convergence to arbitrary order n? like with numerical differentation/integration?

edit: applied it to the e^x limit:

if
h%7D.gif

then
h%7D.gif

i checked one is an overestimation and the other is an underestimation
so a better estimate would be

h%7D%7D%7B2%7D.gif


unfortunately its no where near as elegant as the expression for ln because the radicals can't be combined.
Its funny, i always felt like ln was a "boring" function for some reason. But lately I've got a newfound respect for it.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
$$\log(x)=\left. \dfrac{d}{dm}x^m\right|_{m=0}=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\dfrac{x^{0+h}-x^0}{h}=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\dfrac{x^h-1}{h}$$

yes you can increase the order as much as you want. The trouble is unless you do some clever stuff high order approximate differentiation is unstable.
 
  • #36
yes. I actually use complex step differentation to calculate that yellow normal vector lol its accurate to all displayed decimal places <3
so do you think that given the Fourier series method of averaging the right and left limit works, and that a Fourier series is basically a sum of exponentials, that would explain why the method of averaging the left and right limit of
lim xm/m
m→0
works?
 
Last edited:
  • #37
a good trio for e^x under one exponent is
$$(1+h\, x)^{1/h}\\ (1+h\, x+h^2\, x^2)^{1/h}\\ (1+h\, x+h^2\, x^2/2)^{1/h}$$
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K