What is the Integral of 1/x and its Relationship to ln(x)?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DivergentSpectrum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of 1/x and its relationship to the natural logarithm function ln(x). Participants explore the validity of applying the power rule to this integral, particularly in the case where n equals -1, and examine the implications of limits in this context. The conversation includes both theoretical considerations and personal explorations of the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the integral of 1/x can be derived using limits, suggesting that it converges to ln(x) under certain conditions.
  • Others argue that the claim of the integral being always true is false when n = -1, emphasizing that the limit does not exist in this case.
  • A participant mentions the averaging of left and right limits as a method to approach the integral, questioning the standard definitions and their implications.
  • Concerns are raised about the rigor of the proofs presented, with some participants stating that the methods used do not follow standard mathematical practices.
  • There is a discussion about the lack of alternative definitions for ln(x) in common references, with some participants expressing that the definitions provided seem contrived.
  • Participants explore the idea of generalizing the power rule for all numbers, particularly focusing on the case of x^-1.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the validity of the proposed methods and the conclusions drawn from them, indicating a need for more rigorous proof.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the claims regarding the integral of 1/x and its relationship to ln(x). Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the application of limits and the existence of the integral in the case of n = -1.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps and the dependence on definitions of limits and integrals. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying the power rule in this context and the challenges in establishing rigorous proofs.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying calculus, particularly in understanding the nuances of integration and the properties of logarithmic functions. It may also appeal to individuals interested in mathematical proofs and the exploration of limits.

  • #31
you can think of your limit as an average of
$$\dfrac{x^m-1}{m}\\
\text{and }\\
\dfrac{1-x^{-m}}{m}$$
one is and over estimate and one is an under estimate so the average is better than either
this is an example of estimating derivatives
where we have
$$\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{2h}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
lurflurf said:
you can think of your limit as an average of
$$\dfrac{x^m-1}{m}\\
\text{and }\\
\dfrac{1-x^{-m}}{m}$$
one is and over estimate and one is an under estimate so the average is better than either
this is an example of estimating derivatives
where we have
$$\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{2h}$$
ahh that makes sense. Funny how there can be so many interpretations of one thing
So I am guessing there must be a way to generalize limit formulas to an arbitrary order?
 
Last edited:
  • #33
I always found the relationship ## \int_1^x \frac{1}{x'}dx'=\ln x ## amazing. Think about it: The area under the function of inverse numbers from 1 to x tells you what exponent you have to use for e to get x. I also always wondered if there is a way to understand this more intuitively.
 
  • #34
this is an example of estimating derivatives
derivative of what?
Is it possible to take a limit and increase its convergence to arbitrary order n? like with numerical differentation/integration?

edit: applied it to the e^x limit:

if
h%7D.gif

then
h%7D.gif

i checked one is an overestimation and the other is an underestimation
so a better estimate would be

h%7D%7D%7B2%7D.gif


unfortunately its no where near as elegant as the expression for ln because the radicals can't be combined.
Its funny, i always felt like ln was a "boring" function for some reason. But lately I've got a newfound respect for it.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
$$\log(x)=\left. \dfrac{d}{dm}x^m\right|_{m=0}=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\dfrac{x^{0+h}-x^0}{h}=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\dfrac{x^h-1}{h}$$

yes you can increase the order as much as you want. The trouble is unless you do some clever stuff high order approximate differentiation is unstable.
 
  • #36
yes. I actually use complex step differentation to calculate that yellow normal vector lol its accurate to all displayed decimal places <3
so do you think that given the Fourier series method of averaging the right and left limit works, and that a Fourier series is basically a sum of exponentials, that would explain why the method of averaging the left and right limit of
lim xm/m
m→0
works?
 
Last edited:
  • #37
a good trio for e^x under one exponent is
$$(1+h\, x)^{1/h}\\ (1+h\, x+h^2\, x^2)^{1/h}\\ (1+h\, x+h^2\, x^2/2)^{1/h}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K