What is the Integral of 1/x and its Relationship to ln(x)?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DivergentSpectrum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of 1/x is definitively equal to ln(x), as established through limit evaluation techniques. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the behavior of limits, particularly when approaching zero from both sides, which leads to the conclusion that the average of these limits converges to ln(x). The participants emphasize that while the power rule generally applies, special attention must be given to the case when n = -1, where the limit does not exist in the traditional sense. This exploration reveals a deeper mathematical relationship between logarithmic functions and integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, specifically integration.
  • Familiarity with limits and their properties, particularly two-sided limits.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their definitions.
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and reasoning.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the natural logarithm using limits, specifically the limit definition of ln(x).
  • Explore the application of L'Hôpital's Rule in evaluating indeterminate forms.
  • Learn about the properties of Fourier series and their relationship to limits and integrals.
  • Investigate numerical methods for calculating logarithmic values, comparing Taylor series and limit definitions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and educators interested in the foundational concepts of integration and logarithmic functions, as well as those exploring advanced mathematical proofs and limit evaluations.

  • #31
you can think of your limit as an average of
$$\dfrac{x^m-1}{m}\\
\text{and }\\
\dfrac{1-x^{-m}}{m}$$
one is and over estimate and one is an under estimate so the average is better than either
this is an example of estimating derivatives
where we have
$$\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{2h}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
lurflurf said:
you can think of your limit as an average of
$$\dfrac{x^m-1}{m}\\
\text{and }\\
\dfrac{1-x^{-m}}{m}$$
one is and over estimate and one is an under estimate so the average is better than either
this is an example of estimating derivatives
where we have
$$\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{h}\\
\dfrac{\mathrm{f}(x+h)-\mathrm{f}(x-h)}{2h}$$
ahh that makes sense. Funny how there can be so many interpretations of one thing
So I am guessing there must be a way to generalize limit formulas to an arbitrary order?
 
Last edited:
  • #33
I always found the relationship ## \int_1^x \frac{1}{x'}dx'=\ln x ## amazing. Think about it: The area under the function of inverse numbers from 1 to x tells you what exponent you have to use for e to get x. I also always wondered if there is a way to understand this more intuitively.
 
  • #34
this is an example of estimating derivatives
derivative of what?
Is it possible to take a limit and increase its convergence to arbitrary order n? like with numerical differentation/integration?

edit: applied it to the e^x limit:

if
h%7D.gif

then
h%7D.gif

i checked one is an overestimation and the other is an underestimation
so a better estimate would be

h%7D%7D%7B2%7D.gif


unfortunately its no where near as elegant as the expression for ln because the radicals can't be combined.
Its funny, i always felt like ln was a "boring" function for some reason. But lately I've got a newfound respect for it.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
$$\log(x)=\left. \dfrac{d}{dm}x^m\right|_{m=0}=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\dfrac{x^{0+h}-x^0}{h}=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\dfrac{x^h-1}{h}$$

yes you can increase the order as much as you want. The trouble is unless you do some clever stuff high order approximate differentiation is unstable.
 
  • #36
yes. I actually use complex step differentation to calculate that yellow normal vector lol its accurate to all displayed decimal places <3
so do you think that given the Fourier series method of averaging the right and left limit works, and that a Fourier series is basically a sum of exponentials, that would explain why the method of averaging the left and right limit of
lim xm/m
m→0
works?
 
Last edited:
  • #37
a good trio for e^x under one exponent is
$$(1+h\, x)^{1/h}\\ (1+h\, x+h^2\, x^2)^{1/h}\\ (1+h\, x+h^2\, x^2/2)^{1/h}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K