What is the intercept of N when MN is minimal in a parabola y2 = 2px?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter leprofece
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max Parabola
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the intercept of point N when the distance MN is minimized on the parabola defined by the equation y2 = 2px. Participants explore the geometric and algebraic relationships between points on the parabola and the normal line at point N, delving into calculus and distance minimization techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the intercept of N when MN is minimal is sqrt(2)p.
  • Another participant proposes defining points N and M in terms of their coordinates related to the parameter p and y, allowing for the derivation of the slope of the normal line at N.
  • Several participants discuss the calculation of the slope of the normal line, with expressions being simplified and differentiated to find relationships between y and u.
  • There are multiple expressions for the distance between points N and M, with participants attempting to minimize this distance through algebraic manipulation.
  • Discrepancies arise in the values of u derived by different participants, leading to further exploration of the distance function and its minimization.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their derived expressions and seek clarification on algebraic simplifications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the values of u or the correct form of the distance function. There are competing views on the derivations and simplifications, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the algebraic steps taken to derive the distance function and the values for u, indicating that there may be missing assumptions or errors in earlier calculations that affect the overall understanding of the problem.

leprofece
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
the normal at a point N of the parabole: y2 = 2px to the curve at another point M. calculate the intercept of N when the length of MN is minimal.

Answer sqrt (2) p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: max and min parabole

I would begin be letting point $N$ be $$\left(\frac{y^2}{2p},y\right)$$ and point $M$ be $$\left(\frac{u^2}{2p},u\right)$$. Now, you know what the slope of the line through $M$ and $N$ has to be since this line is normal to the given parabola at $N$, so this will allow you to express $u$ as a function of $y$ and the parameter $p$.

Then you can construct a function representing the distance (or the square of the distance) between $M$ and $N$ which you can minimize. Once you have the particular $y$ critical $y$-value you can then find the root or $x$-intercept of this line.
 
Re: max and min parabole

MarkFL said:
I would begin be letting point $N$ be $$\left(\frac{y^2}{2p},y\right)$$ and point $M$ be $$\left(\frac{u^2}{2p},u\right)$$. Now, you know what the slope of the line through $M$ and $N$ has to be since this line is normal to the given parabola at $N$, so this will allow you to express $u$ as a function of $y$ and the parameter $p$.

Then you can construct a function representing the distance (or the square of the distance) between $M$ and $N$ which you can minimize. Once you have the particular $y$ critical $y$-value you can then find the root or $x$-intercept of this line.

Calculating I got
Slope m = (2p (u-y))/(u2-y2)

Solving para y i must get y = (-2px)/(u + y)

Distance = sqrt ( y2-u2)/2p)2 + (u-y)2)
 
You are correct in that the slope of the line is:

$$m=\frac{2p}{y+u}$$

(I simplified a bit).

Now, can you use the calculus to come up with another expression for the slope using the fact that the line is normal to the parabola at $N$?
 
MarkFL said:
You are correct in that the slope of the line is:

$$m=\frac{2p}{y+u}$$

(I simplified a bit).

Now, can you use the calculus to come up with another expression for the slope using the fact that the line is normal to the parabola at $N$?

It must be -(y+u)/2p ??

How can proceed?
 
No, you need to use differentiation to find the slope of the normal line at $N$. You want to compute:

$$-\frac{dx}{dy}$$
 
the derivative is
m = 2p/(y+u)2

and normal N = - (y+u)2/2p
 
You have:

$$x=\frac{y^2}{2p}$$

So, what is $$-\frac{dx}{dy}$$?
 
MarkFL said:
You have:

$$x=\frac{y^2}{2p}$$

So, what is $$-\frac{dx}{dy}$$?

derivative of x as a function of y
y/p is the derivative
 
  • #10
Correct, but you want the negative of this. And now you have two expressions representing the slope of the normal line and you may equate them and get $u$ as a function of $y$. Then continue following the instructions I gave in my first post. :D
 
  • #11
MarkFL said:
Correct, but you want the negative of this. And now you have two expressions representing the slope of the normal line and you may equate them and get $u$ as a function of $y$. Then continue following the instructions I gave in my first post. :D

I get $u=\frac{-y}{2p^2}-y$ and the distance squared between $N$ and $M$ to be $y^2(2+\frac{1}{2p^2})^2+\frac{y^4(1+\frac{1}{2p^2})^2-p)^2}{2p^2}$ Is this right and how do you proceed?
 
  • #12
I get a different value for $u$...how did you obtain the value you have?
 
  • #13
MarkFL said:
I get a different value for $u$...how did you obtain the value you have?

sorry, I now get $u=(2p^2-y^2)/y)$. How do you minimise the length, which is quite a nasty expression?
 
  • #14
That is closer to the value I have for $u$, but still different. The resulting expression for the square of the distance $\overline{MN}$, while daunting at first, may be algebraically simplified substantially.
 
  • #15
well The distance you have I don't know if it is good but I don't understand where they come from
begining
you wrote y2(1 +1/2p2)2 + or = ?? (y4(1 +1/2p2)2-p2) y2(1 +1/2p2)2
After operating I got y2(1 +1/2p2)2(p2+y2) y2(1 +1/2p2)2/ 2p2

Maybe I am wrong if so, tell me how you got to the u in your last post
 
  • #16
I got:

$$u=-\frac{2p^2+y^2}{y}$$

And so the objective function (the square of $\overline{MN}$) is:

$$f(y)=\left(\frac{y^2}{2p}-\frac{\left(\dfrac{2p^2+y^2}{y}\right)^2}{2p}\right)^2+\left(y+\frac{2p^2+y^2}{y}\right)^2$$

After some algebraic simplification, I obtained:

$$f(y)=4\left(\left(\frac{p}{y}\right)^2+1\right)\left(y^2+1\right)$$

Now, I will leave you to verify this, and then minimize the objective function.
 
  • #17
MarkFL said:
I got:

$$u=-\frac{2p^2+y^2}{y}$$

And so the objective function (the square of $\overline{MN}$) is:

$$f(y)=\left(\frac{y^2}{2p}-\frac{\dfrac{2p^2+y^2}{y}}{2p}\right)^2+\left(y+\frac{2p^2+y^2}{y}\right)^2$$

After some algebraic simplification, I obtained:

$$f(y)=4\left(\left(\frac{p}{y}\right)^2+1\right)\left(y^2+1\right)$$

Now, I will leave you to verify this, and then minimize the objective function.

After an hour trying to get your answer I was not able to get it
I got y3(y+2)/(4p2) + (y4+4p2)(1+16p2)(42y2])- (y +1 +8y2)

So It is a very difficult algebra
 
  • #18
How can I get to f(y)=4((p/y)2+1)(y2+1)
my friend?
Could you please tell me??
 
Last edited:
  • #19
This is what I did:

$$f(y)=\left(\frac{y^2}{2p}-\frac{\left(\dfrac{2p^2+y^2}{y}\right)^2}{2p}\right)^2+\left(y+\frac{2p^2+y^2}{y}\right)^2=$$

$$\frac{1}{4p^2}\left(y^2-\frac{4p^4+4p^2y^2+y^4}{y^2}\right)^2+\left(\frac{2p^2+2y^2}{y}\right)^2=$$

$$\frac{1}{4p^2}\left(\frac{4p^4+4p^2y^2}{y^2}\right)^2+4\left(\frac{p^2+y^2}{y}\right)^2=$$

$$4p^2\left(\frac{p^2+y^2}{y^2}\right)^2+4\left(\frac{p^2+y^2}{y}\right)^2=$$

At this point, I discovered I originally made an error...

$$4\left(p^2+y^2\right)^2\left(\frac{p^2}{y^4}+\frac{1}{y^2}\right)=$$

$$4\left(p^2+y^2\right)^2\left(\frac{y^2+p^2}{y^4}\right)=$$

$$4\left(\left(\frac{p}{y}\right)^2+1\right)\left(p^2+y^2\right)$$
 
  • #20
Thanks now I derived this expression and got
8(1+p2)(y-y2+p2)/(y2)
and I equated to 0
and got y2-y-p2 but I didnt get anything
 
  • #21
leprofece said:
Thanks now I derived this expression and got
8(1+p2)(y-y2+p2)/(y2)
and I equated to 0
and got y2-y-p2 but I didnt get anything

Well, not knowing what you did, I can't really say where you went wrong. :D

I highly recommend for you to take some time to learn how to use $\LaTeX$ to show your work...plain text is very hard to read for all but the simplest of computations and expressions. This will be a great way for you to help us to help you. (Sun)
 
  • #22
I have just derived the expression that we have got before
 
  • #23
leprofece said:
I have just derived the expression that we have got before

Until I see what you did, I can't possibly tell you where you went wrong.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K