What is the largest integer less than or equal to the given expression?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a sequence defined by a recurrence relation and aims to find the largest integer less than or equal to a specific expression involving terms of the sequence. The problem is mathematical in nature, focusing on sequences and their properties.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces a sequence defined by $b_1=3$, $b_2=3$, and the recurrence relation $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2+2007$.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the problem's complexity, indicating that the solution may not be straightforward.
  • A later reply acknowledges a flaw in their previous method and presents an alternative approach involving the manipulation of the recurrence relation.
  • The alternative method leads to the formulation of a new equation involving ratios of consecutive terms, $k_i=\dfrac{b_i}{b_{i-1}}$, and establishes a relationship between these ratios.
  • It is proposed that $k_{2007}+\dfrac{1}{k_{2007}}$ is slightly less than 225, leading to the conclusion that the floor of the expression is 224.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the solution, as there is acknowledgment of uncertainty and the complexity of the problem. Multiple approaches and interpretations are presented without a definitive resolution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of the sequence and the properties of the ratios, which may not be fully explored or validated. The implications of the recurrence relation on the sequence's growth are also not conclusively addressed.

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let a sequence be defined as follows:

$b_1=3$, $b_2=3$, and for $n \ge 2$, $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2+2007$.

Find the largest integer less than or equal to $\dfrac{b_{2007}^2+b_{2006}^2}{b_{2007}b_{2006}}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

Given $b_1=3$, $b_2=3$, and for $n \ge 2$, $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2+2007$.

Build a table for a few terms for $n>2$ to check if there is a pattern to be observed:

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 800"]
[TR]
[TD]n[/TD]
[TD]$b_{n+1}=\dfrac{b_n^2+2007}{b_{n-1}}$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]$b_3=\dfrac{b_2^2+2007}{b_1}=\dfrac{3^2+2007}{3}=672$[/TD]
[TD]-[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]$b_4=\dfrac{b_3^2+2007}{b_2}=\dfrac{672^2+2007}{3}=151197$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_4}{b_3}=\dfrac{151197}{672} \approx 224.9955357 \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]$b_5=\dfrac{b_4^2+2007}{b_3}=\dfrac{151197^2+2007}{672}=34018653$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_5}{b_4} \approx 224.99555 \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]$b_6=\dfrac{b_5^2+2007}{b_4}=\dfrac{34018653^2+2007}{151197}=7654045728$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_6}{b_5} \approx 224.99556 \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]$b_7=\dfrac{b_6^2+2007}{b_5}=\dfrac{7654045728^2+2007}{34018653}=1.72212627\times10^{12}$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_7}{b_6} \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]$b_8=\dfrac{b_7^2+2007}{b_6}=\dfrac{(1.72212627 \times10^{12})^2+2007}{7654045728}=3.8747 \times10^{14}$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_8}{b_7} \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]$\vdots$[/TD]
[TD]$\vdots$[/TD]
[TD]$\vdots$[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

That is, we have generated a "geometric-like" sequence with the common ratio that takes the approximate value of 225 (in fact, the so-called common ratio is increasing as $n$ increases).

Another thing that is worth mentioning here is as $n$ increases, the value of $b_n$ increases monumentally that the addition of the value 2007 in the numerator brings no significant increment to the numerator and we can thus treat the whole equation of $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2+2007$ as $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2$ or $\dfrac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}=\dfrac{b_n}{b_{n-1}}$, i.e. the terms of $b_n$ generate a geometric sequence.

$\therefore \dfrac{b_{2007}^2+b_{2006}^2}{b_{2007}b_{2006}}= \dfrac{b_{2007}}{b_{2006}}+\dfrac{b_{2006}}{b_{2007}}=\dfrac{b_{2007}}{b_{2006}}+\dfrac{1}{\dfrac{b_{2007}}{b_{2006}}}<225+\dfrac{1}{225} <225.00444$

Hence the largest integer less than or equal to $\dfrac{b_{2007}^2+b_{2006}^2}{b_{2007}b_{2006}}$ is 225.
 
This is a wicked little problem, and I am not sure that we have got to the root of it.

anemone said:
My solution:

Given $b_1=3$, $b_2=3$, and for $n \ge 2$, $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2+2007$.

Build a table for a few terms for $n>2$ to check if there is a pattern to be observed:

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 800"]
[TR]
[TD]n[/TD]
[TD]$b_{n+1}=\dfrac{b_n^2+2007}{b_{n-1}}$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]$b_3=\dfrac{b_2^2+2007}{b_1}=\dfrac{3^2+2007}{3}=672$[/TD]
[TD]-[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]$b_4=\dfrac{b_3^2+2007}{b_2}=\dfrac{672^2+2007}{3}=151197$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_4}{b_3}=\dfrac{151197}{672} \approx 224.9955357 \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]$b_5=\dfrac{b_4^2+2007}{b_3}=\dfrac{151197^2+2007}{672}=34018653$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_5}{b_4} \approx 224.99555 \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]$b_6=\dfrac{b_5^2+2007}{b_4}=\dfrac{34018653^2+2007}{151197}=7654045728$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_6}{b_5} \approx 224.99556 \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]$b_7=\dfrac{b_6^2+2007}{b_5}=\dfrac{7654045728^2+2007}{34018653}=1.72212627\times10^{12}$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_7}{b_6} \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]$b_8=\dfrac{b_7^2+2007}{b_6}=\dfrac{(1.72212627 \times10^{12})^2+2007}{7654045728}=3.8747 \times10^{14}$[/TD]
[TD]$\dfrac{b_8}{b_7} \approx 225$[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]$\vdots$[/TD]
[TD]$\vdots$[/TD]
[TD]$\vdots$[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

That is, we have generated a "geometric-like" sequence with the common ratio that takes the approximate value of 225 (in fact, the so-called common ratio is increasing as $n$ increases).

Another thing that is worth mentioning here is as $n$ increases, the value of $b_n$ increases monumentally that the addition of the value 2007 in the numerator brings no significant increment to the numerator and we can thus treat the whole equation of $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2+2007$ as $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2$ or $\dfrac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}=\dfrac{b_n}{b_{n-1}}$, i.e. the terms of $b_n$ generate a geometric sequence.

$\therefore \dfrac{b_{2007}^2+b_{2006}^2}{b_{2007}b_{2006}}= \dfrac{b_{2007}}{b_{2006}}+\dfrac{b_{2006}}{b_{2007}}=\dfrac{b_{2007}}{b_{2006}}+\dfrac{1}{\dfrac{b_{2007}}{b_{2006}}}<225+\dfrac{1}{225} <225.00444$

Hence the largest integer less than or equal to $\dfrac{b_{2007}^2+b_{2006}^2}{b_{2007}b_{2006}}$ is 225.
You have shown that the ratio $x_n = \dfrac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}$ is very close to 225. But suppose it always stays just sufficiently less than 225 to ensure that $x_n + x_n^{-1} = \dfrac{b_{n+1}^2+b_{n}^2}{b_{n+1}b_{n}}$ is also less than 225. In that case, "the largest integer less than or equal to $\dfrac{b_{2007}^2+b_{2006}^2}{b_{2007}b_{2006}}$" would be 224, not 225. As far as I can see, that appears to be what actually happens.

The condition $x_n + x_n^{-1} < 225$ is equivalent to the condition that $x_n$ should lie between the two roots of the equation $x + x^{-1} = 225$, or $x^2 - 225x + 1 = 0$. The larger of the two roots is $\frac12\bigl(225 + \sqrt{50621}\bigl) \approx 224.99556.$ So we have to ask whether $x_n$ stays below that value.

Divide both sides of the equation $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2+2007$ by $b_nb_{n-1}$ to get $x_{n+1} = \dfrac{2007}{b_{n-1}b_n} + x_n$. Apply that relation inductively to see that $$x_n = 2007\left(\frac1{b_{n-1}b_n} + \frac1{b_{n-2}b_{n-1}} + \ldots + \frac1{b_4b_3}\right) + x_3.$$ Next, the sequence $(x_n)$ is increasing, and $x_3 = b_4/b_3 \approx 224.9955357 >224.9$. Therefore $x_n = b_{n+1}/b_n >224.9$ whenever $n\geqslant3.$ Thus $b_n > 224.9b_{n-1}$ and (again by an inductive argument) $b_n > 224.9^{n-3}b_3 = 672\cdot 224.9^{n-3}.$ It follows that $$x_n < \frac{2007}{672^2}\left(\frac1{224.9^{2n-7}} + \frac1{224.9^{2n-9}} + \ldots + \frac1{224.9}\right) + x_3.$$ If we replace the geometric series in the large brackets by the corresponding infinite geometric series, which has sum $\dfrac1{224.9(1-224.9^{-1})}$ then we get the estimate $$x_n < \frac{2007}{672^2\cdot 224.9(1-224.9^{-1})} + x_3 \approx 0.0000198 + 224.9955357 = 224.9955555 .$$ This is less than $224.99556$, so it appears that $x_n+x_n^{-1}$ always stays below 225.

I hate to rely on such delicate numerical evidence, especially since my little calculator only works to 8 significant figures. I would much prefer to have an analytic argument showing that the answer to the problem is $224$, but I don't see how to do that.
 
Last edited:
anemone said:
Let a sequence be defined as follows:

$b_1=3$, $b_2=3$, and for $n \ge 2$, $b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2+2007$.

Find the largest integer less than or equal to $\dfrac{b_{2007}^2+b_{2006}^2}{b_{2007}b_{2006}}$.

Yes, you're right, Opalg, my method doesn't hold true (also, thanks for pointing this out) and I've found online another brilliant method to solve the problem and I wanted to share that here with my friends at MHB.

We are given that

$b_{n+1}b_{n-1}=b_n^2+2007$--(1)

Replacing $n$ by $n-1$ we have

$b_{n}b_{n-2}=b_{n-1}^2+2007$

$b_{n-1}^2=b_{n}b_{n-2}-2007$--(2)

Adding the equations (1) and (2) gives

$b_{n-1}(b_{n+1}+b_{n-1})=b_{n}(b_{n}+b_{n-2})$

$\dfrac{b_{n+1}+b_{n-1}}{b_{n}}=\dfrac{b_{n}+b_{n-2}}{b_{n-1}}$

If we define $k_i=\dfrac{b_i}{b_{i-1}}$ for each $i \ge 2$, the equation above means

$k_{n+1}+\dfrac{1}{k_n}=k_n+\dfrac{1}{k_{n-1}}$

We can thus calculate that

$k_{2007}+\dfrac{1}{k_{2006}}=k_3+\dfrac{1}{k_{2}}=225$

Now, notice that $k_{2007}=\dfrac{b_{2007}}{b_{2006}}=\dfrac{b_{2006}^2+2007}{b_{2005}b_{2006}}>\dfrac{b_{2006}}{b_{2005}}=k_{2006}$.

This means that

$k_{2007}+\dfrac{1}{k_{2007}}<k_{2007}+\dfrac{1}{k_{2006}}=225$

It is only a tiny bit less because all of the $k_i$ are greater than 1, so we conclude that the floor of $\dfrac{b_{2007}^2+b_{2006}^2}{b_{2007}b_{2006}}=k_{2007}+\dfrac{1}{k_{2007}}$ is 224.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K