Graduate What is the limit of this (complicated) set?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adeimantus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence properties of a doubly infinite sequence of random variables, denoted as X_{i,n}, in relation to the Strong Law of Large Numbers. The sequence converges almost surely to constants a_i, with the series sum of a_i being finite (μ < ∞). The participant queries whether the limit of the sequence of sets A_j, defined by the convergence behavior of the sums of X_{i,n}, approaches a set A that describes the overall convergence of the infinite series. The notation "i.o." stands for "infinitely often," indicating the conditions under which the convergence properties are evaluated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Strong Law of Large Numbers
  • Familiarity with concepts of almost sure convergence
  • Knowledge of probability theory and measure theory
  • Experience with sequences and series in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Strong Law of Large Numbers in probability theory
  • Explore the concept of almost sure convergence in detail
  • Investigate the properties of probability measures related to convergence
  • Learn about the behavior of infinite series and their convergence criteria
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and students of probability theory who are analyzing convergence properties of sequences of random variables and their implications in statistical inference.

Adeimantus
Messages
112
Reaction score
1
This is going to take a while to set up, so I apologize for that. This came up in the course of thinking about the Strong Law of Large Numbers. It's not homework.

Suppose you have a doubly infinite sequence of random variables X_{i,n} that obey the following almost sure convergence relations. For each i = 1,2,3,...,

X_{i,n} \xrightarrow{a.s} a_i \quad \mbox{ as } \quad n\xrightarrow{} \infty.

Further, we have that \sum_{i=1}^\infty a_i = \mu &lt; \infty. Since this series converges, for any \delta &gt; 0, there is some smallest I such that \left| \sum_{i=1}^m a_i - \mu \right | &lt; \delta for all m \geq I. Consider a sequence of deltas decreasing to zero, and the increasing sequence of their corresponding I's.

\delta_1 &gt; \delta_2 &gt; ... \xrightarrow{} 0 \quad \mbox{and} \quad I_1 &lt; I_2 &lt; ...

Consider some particular pair (\delta_j, I_j). Since almost sure convergence is linear,

\sum_{i=1}^{I_j}X_{i,n} \xrightarrow{a.s} \sum_{i=1}^{I_j} a_i \quad \mbox{ as } \quad n\xrightarrow{} \infty

This is the same thing as saying the set

\{ \omega: \left| \sum_{i=1}^{I_j}X_{i,n}(\omega) - \sum_{i=1}^{I_j} a_i \right| &gt; \epsilon \quad i.o. \quad n\xrightarrow{} \infty \}

has probability zero for any choice of \epsilon &gt; 0. From the definition of the deltas and I's, the set

A_j = \{ \omega: \left| \sum_{i=1}^{I_j}X_{i,n}(\omega) - \mu \right| &gt; \epsilon + \delta_j \quad i.o. \quad n\xrightarrow{} \infty \}

also probability zero. My question is, does the sequence of sets A_j have a limit of

A = \{ \omega: \left| \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}X_{i,n}(\omega) - \mu \right| &gt; \epsilon \quad i.o. \quad n\xrightarrow{} \infty \}

Thanks for wading through that!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I waded some of the way, then got stuck here:
Adeimantus said:
\left\{ \omega: \left| \sum_{i=1}^{I_j}X_{i,n}(\omega) - \sum_{i=1}^{I_j} a_i \right| &gt; \epsilon \quad i.o. \quad n\xrightarrow{} \infty \right\}
I have not come across the initials ##i.o.## before. What do they mean?

I feel that perhaps the set is
\left\{ \omega:<br /> \forall M\in\mathbb N\ \exists n\ge M\ :\<br /> \left| \sum_{i=1}^{I_j}X_{i,n}(\omega) - \sum_{i=1}^{I_j} a_i \right| &gt; \epsilon \right\}
in which case the statement is that the set of ##\omega## for which the ##n##-indexed sequence of sums of the first ##I_j## RVs does not converge to the sum of the first ##I_j## ##a_i##s, has probability measure zero.

Is that what you meant?
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K