What is the link between ordinary and dark matter?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential interactions between ordinary (baryonic) matter and dark matter, particularly in the context of galaxy formation and structure. Participants explore observations from mini-spiral galaxies and the Milky Way, questioning established models and proposing alternative interpretations of the data.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants report findings from a study of 36 galaxies suggesting a link between the structure of ordinary matter and dark matter, challenging the notion that dark matter interacts only through gravity.
  • Others express skepticism about the ability to rule out normal matter interactions in explaining anomalies in galaxy structure, emphasizing the complexity of the physics involved.
  • A participant notes that the galaxies studied do not conform to the NFW profile typically used for estimating dark matter halos, indicating potential discrepancies in current models.
  • One contributor suggests that the relationship between ordinary and dark matter is fundamentally gravitational, proposing that these interactions may point to new physics beyond the Standard Model.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for concrete models that can explain discrepancies across multiple observations, rather than vague assertions about dark matter interactions.
  • There is mention of the Milky Way's dark matter halo being lopsided, with evidence suggesting a non-baryonic fluid as the main contributor to gravitational potential in galaxy clusters.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some supporting the idea of non-gravitational interactions between ordinary and dark matter, while others argue for the necessity of more evidence and clearer models. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges in interpreting data related to galaxy formation and the limitations of current models, highlighting the need for further evidence and exploration of the phenomena discussed.

Dee Flont
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Unexpected interaction between dark matter and ordinary matter in mini-spiral galaxies

"We studied 36 galaxies, which was a sufficient number for statistical study. By doing this, we found a link between the structure of ordinary, or luminous matter like stars, dust and gas, with dark matter."​

“dark matter, according to the most hypotheses, would be non-baryonic or WIMP. It would not interact with ordinary matter except through gravitational force. Our observations, however, disagree with this notion."​
 
Space news on Phys.org
Dee Flont said:
Unexpected interaction between dark matter and ordinary matter in mini-spiral galaxies

"We studied 36 galaxies, which was a sufficient number for statistical study. By doing this, we found a link between the structure of ordinary, or luminous matter like stars, dust and gas, with dark matter."​

“dark matter, according to the most hypotheses, would be non-baryonic or WIMP. It would not interact with ordinary matter except through gravitational force. Our observations, however, disagree with this notion."​
Personal note:
Hey, I was a postdoc at SISSA! I knew Paulo and interacted with him quite often when I was there. Definitely fun to hang out with.

As for this specific work, it comes with the usual caveats: the physics of normal matter with regard to galaxy formation is extremely difficult. I generally feel that it's going to always be very very difficult to rule out normal matter interactions for explaining anomalies in galaxy structure.

If I'm reading this paper correctly, they try to do this by showing that the galaxies don't appear to have any anomalous changes in structure as their mass changes, but nevertheless do not follow the NFW profile that is typically used for estimating dark matter halos.

Anyway, I feel this is generally interesting work, but this kind of research is really really hard, and we'd need a lot more evidence from many more directions to come to a firm conclusion that dark matter has significant non-gravitational interactions, or that there is something other than dark matter at work in these observations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stoomart
Chalnoth said:
Personal note:
Hey, I was a postdoc at SISSA! I knew Paulo and interacted with him quite often when I was there. Definitely fun to hang out with.

As for this specific work, it comes with the usual caveats: the physics of normal matter with regard to galaxy formation is extremely difficult. I generally feel that it's going to always be very very difficult to rule out normal matter interactions for explaining anomalies in galaxy structure.

If I'm reading this paper correctly, they try to do this by showing that the galaxies don't appear to have any anomalous changes in structure as their mass changes, but nevertheless do not follow the NFW profile that is typically used for estimating dark matter halos.

Anyway, I feel this is generally interesting work, but this kind of research is really really hard, and we'd need a lot more evidence from many more directions to come to a firm conclusion that dark matter has significant non-gravitational interactions, or that there is something other than dark matter at work in these observations.

The following is more evidence of the same physical phenomenon as SISSA found which we are not allowed to discuss because it has to do with baryonic matter interacting with dark matter which is not what mainstream physics thinks occurs.

The Milky Way's dark matter halo appears to be lopsided

The emerging picture of the dark matter halo of the Milky Way is dominantly lopsided in nature.​

Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies

Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely.​
 
I believe the link is they both have gravity. The artlicle doesn't say what they're talking about other than saying:
the relationship is obvious and cannot be explained in a trivial way within the context of the Standard Model, these objects may serve as "portals" to a completely new form of Physics which can explain phenomena like matter and dark energy.
 
Dee Flont said:
The following is more evidence of the same physical phenomenon as SISSA found which we are not allowed to discuss because it has to do with baryonic matter interacting with dark matter which is not what mainstream physics thinks occurs.
First of all, SISSA didn't find it. SISSA is a school in Northern Italy.

Paulo Salucci and his student Ekaterina Karukes compiled some existing data to show that galaxy structure isn't what you'd naively expect from basic modeling assuming ##\Lambda##CDM. The precise cause of this discrepancy isn't noted, just that there is a discrepancy and that discrepancy might be useful in understanding the nature of dark matter.
Dee Flont said:
The Milky Way's dark matter halo appears to be lopsided
Dee Flont said:
The emerging picture of the dark matter halo of the Milky Way is dominantly lopsided in nature.​

Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies

Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely.​
The problem with all of these is that they're all pretty vague in terms of what they mean for our universe. To move forward we need more than just vague discrepancies with the standard model. In particular, we need a concrete model that explains a number of discrepancies, across multiple independent observations. In other words, the model needs to explain some feature of the universe that is completely independent of galaxy structure for us to have confidence in the result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Featured
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K