What is the magnitude of the field at point R?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at point R due to a charge q. The distance from the charge to point R is determined to be 10m, leading to the expression for the electric field at R as E_R = kq/100. There is confusion regarding the inclusion of E_p in the calculations, but it is clarified that the ratio of the fields can be derived from their respective distances. The final expressions for the electric fields at points R and P are confirmed, with the ratio E_R/E_P equating to 9/100. The calculations are validated, and the approach to solving the problem is deemed correct.
paulimerci
Messages
287
Reaction score
47
Homework Statement
Problem attached below.
Relevant Equations
E = kq/r^2
I've no idea how to solve this problem. The sign of the charge is not mentioned, so I'm assuming the charge is "+". The charge exerts an outward electric field. Since two lengths of the right-angle triangle are given, I use the Pythagorean to find the hypotenuse, which is the distance between q and R, and it's found to be 10m.

$$ E = \frac{kq}{r^2}$$
$$ E = \frac{kq} {100}$$
I'm wondering why all the options have ##E_p## in the equation since it asks only for the magnitude of the field for point R. It would be great if anyone could explain how to solve this one.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-05-18 at 11.10.41 PM.png
    Screenshot 2023-05-18 at 11.10.41 PM.png
    16.4 KB · Views: 94
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
write expressions for the fields at points P and R in terms of q.
 
haruspex said:
write expressions for the fields at points P and R in terms of q.
ok.
The electric field at point R is
$$ E_{R} = \frac{kq}{100}$$
The electric field at point P is
$$ E_{p} = \frac {kq}{9}$$
$$ 9\times E_{P} = kq$$
$$ 9\times E_{P} = E_R \times 100$$
$$ E_R = \frac {9 E_P} {100}$$
Is it right?
 
paulimerci said:
The electric field at point R is
$$ E_{R} = \frac{kq}{100}$$
The electric field at point P is
$$ E_{p} = \frac {kq}{9}$$
These are wrong because you used centimeters in your calculations.
But final answer is ok since here we calculate the ratio.
 
paulimerci said:
Thank you for pointing out @MatinSAR. I edited it. Does it look ok now?
The electric field at point R is
$$ E_{R} = \frac{kq}{100 \times 10^{-4}}$$
The electric field at point P is
$$ E_{p} = \frac {kq}{9 \times 10^{-4}}$$
The ratio of ##\frac{E_P}{E_R}## gives,
paulimerci said:
$$ 9\times 10^{-4} E_{P} = kq$$
$$ 9\times 10^{-4} E_{P} = E_R \times 100 \times 10^{-4}$$
$$ E_R = \frac {9 E_P} {100}$$
 
@paulimerci Yes, It's correct now.An easier way:

##\frac {E_R}{E_P}=\frac {\frac {kq}{r_R^2}}{\frac {kq}{r_P^2}}=(\frac {r_P}{r_R})^2=(\frac {3}{10})^2=\frac {9}{100}##
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top