What is the meaning of a unique inverse for a bijective function?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter waht
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of uniqueness in the context of inverses for bijective functions. Participants explore the meaning of "unique" in relation to the existence of an inverse function and its implications for one-to-one correspondence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of "unique" in the context of a bijective function's inverse, suggesting it relates to one-to-one correspondence.
  • Another participant asserts that uniqueness means there is only one inverse, stating that if a function has inverses g and h, then g must equal h.
  • A further clarification indicates that "g = h" implies g(x) = h(x) for every x in the range of the function f.
  • One participant elaborates on the concept of uniqueness, discussing the significance of the definite article "the" in defining a unique element.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the notion that a bijective function has a unique inverse, but the precise interpretation of "unique" and its implications are discussed with varying levels of detail and clarity.

Contextual Notes

Some statements involve complex logical definitions that may depend on specific interpretations of mathematical notation and terminology, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

waht
Messages
1,502
Reaction score
4
What does "unique" mean?

I ran into a trivial exercise. If a function f is bijective, show that it has an inverse. That's easy. But then, the question goes: if f has an inverse, show that it is unique.

I'm not really sure what is meant by "unique." I would assume it is has to do with the function's one-to-one correspondence. That each element in the function is taken cared of (mapped) one at a time. Is this a good analogy? This is not homework by the way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means there is only one inverse. In other words if a function, f, has inverses g and h, then g=h, and there is really only one inverse.
 
And, of course, "g= h" mean g(x)= h(x) for every x in the range of f.
 
That makes sense, thanks.
 
what said:
I ran into a trivial exercise. If a function f is bijective, show that it has an inverse. That's easy. But then, the question goes: if f has an inverse, show that it is unique.

I'm not really sure what is meant by "unique." I would assume it is has to do with the function's one-to-one correspondence. That each element in the function is taken cared of (mapped) one at a time. Is this a good analogy? This is not homework by the way.

x is unique means, there is one and only one thing that x is.

'The' in the particular, in the singular, is the meaning of 'unique'.

The definite article 'the' refers to that one and only x.

The x such that Fx, is that (unique) x which satisfies Fx.

That there is only one x which satisfies Fx is defined:
EyAx(x=y <-> Fx).

The unique x which is F has the property G, means, EyAx((x=y <-> Fx) & Gy).
 
Well, I'm glad we got that clarified!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K