What is the Meaning of Persistence Length?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nancy189
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The persistence length is a critical measure of polymer flexibility, indicating the distance over which a polymer behaves elastically versus statically. It is defined as the characteristic length scale at which the correlation of tangent angles along the polymer decreases exponentially. For distances shorter than the persistence length, the polymer behaves like a rigid rod, while for longer distances, it behaves like a flexible noodle. The mathematical representation of this relationship is given by the equation (0)·u(i) = exp(-l/p), where 'l' is the distance and 'p' is the persistence length.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polymer physics
  • Familiarity with elasticity and static behavior of materials
  • Basic knowledge of exponential functions
  • Experience with tangent vector analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of persistence length in polymers
  • Explore the applications of persistence length in biophysics, particularly in DNA and microtubules
  • Learn about the experimental methods for measuring persistence length
  • Investigate the implications of persistence length on polymer behavior in various environments
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in biophysics, materials scientists, and students studying polymer physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the mechanical properties of polymers and their applications in biological systems.

nancy189
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I was reading an article which talked about measuring the persistence length of DNA and microtubules. I didnt understand what the term meant, tried wikipedia but it confused me further. So could anyone explain what persistence length means in layman terms?

Nancy
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Persistence length is a way of measuring the point at which a polymer ceases to be treated like elastically and can be treated statically.
 
Thanks Ryan. Could you further elaborate on that?
 
nancy189 said:
Thanks Ryan. Could you further elaborate on that?

What are you struggling with?
 
The persistence length of a long object (such as a polymer) is a measure of the flexibility of that object. Imagine a long cord that is slightly flexible. At short distance scales, the cord will basically be rigid. If you look at the direction the cord is pointing at two points that are very close together, the cord will likely be pointing in the same direction at those two points (i.e. the angles of the tangent vectors are highly correlated). If you choose two points on the this flexible cord (imagine a piece of cooked spaghetti that you've just tossed on your plate) that are very far apart, however, the tangent to the cords at those locations will likely be pointing in different directions (i.e. the angles will be uncorrelated). If you plot out how correlated the tangent angles at two different points are as a function of the distance between the the two points, you'll get a plot that starts out at 1 (perfect correlation) at a distance of zero and drops exponentially as distance increases. The persistence length is the characteristic length scale of that exponential decay.
 
Ryan, I didn't understand what you meant by treating a polymer statically.

Thanks Ygggdrasil. That definitely cleared things. I was also wondering what will be the behavior of the cord in the following cases.
1. Its length is lower than the persistence length.
2. Its length is higher than the persistence length.

If I understood it correctly, I think the cord will be rigid in case 1 and more flexible in case 2. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Nancy
 
Yes, you are correct. When considering distances shorter than the persistence length, the cord acts much more like a stiff, rigid rod than a flexible noodle. For distances much longer than the persistence length, the cord acts much more like a flexible noodle than a rigid rod.
 
Ygggdrasil said:
The persistence length of a long object (such as a polymer) is a measure of the flexibility of that object. Imagine a long cord that is slightly flexible. At short distance scales, the cord will basically be rigid. If you look at the direction the cord is pointing at two points that are very close together, the cord will likely be pointing in the same direction at those two points (i.e. the angles of the tangent vectors are highly correlated). If you choose two points on the this flexible cord (imagine a piece of cooked spaghetti that you've just tossed on your plate) that are very far apart, however, the tangent to the cords at those locations will likely be pointing in different directions (i.e. the angles will be uncorrelated). If you plot out how correlated the tangent angles at two different points are as a function of the distance between the the two points, you'll get a plot that starts out at 1 (perfect correlation) at a distance of zero and drops exponentially as distance increases. The persistence length is the characteristic length scale of that exponential decay.
since the directions are opposite,how can i calculate the pl by '<u(0)·u(i)>=exp(-l/p)'.some values are negtive,so i can not fit the exponential line...what should i do?
thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
727
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K