What is the meanning of this propisition ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Maths Lover
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a proposition from Artin's book regarding the associative law of composition on a set S. It states that for any integer n, a unique product of n elements can be defined with specific properties: the product of one element is the element itself, the product of two elements follows the associative law, and the product of n elements can be recursively defined. An example using the addition of real numbers illustrates that the sum of any number of integers yields a unique result, independent of how the integers are grouped.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of associative law in mathematics
  • Familiarity with basic set theory
  • Knowledge of integer operations
  • Concept of recursive definitions in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of associative operations in algebra
  • Explore recursive functions and their applications in mathematics
  • Learn about the implications of the associative law in different mathematical structures
  • Investigate examples of associative operations beyond addition, such as multiplication
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of associative operations and their implications in algebra and set theory.

Maths Lover
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
hi , this proposition is from artin's book ,

it says :
Proposition : suppose an associative law of composition is given on a set S.
There is a unique way to define , for every integer n , a product of n elements
a1, …… , an of S ( we denote it by [a1 …an ] ) with the following properties :
-The product [a1] of one element is the element itself
-The product [a1 a2] of two elements is given by the law of composition ;
-For any integer I between 1 and n , [a1 .. an]=[a1….ai][a(i+1)…..an]


and I didn't understand excatly the meaning which the proposition says , so can anyone make it clear to me please ? and if there an example it'll be more better :)
 

Attachments

  • proposition.png
    proposition.png
    23.5 KB · Views: 493
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a simple example, using addition of real numbers.

You only define what addition means for adding two numbers (not more than two).

The associative law says that (x + y) + z = x + (y + z) for any three numbers x, y, and z.

The proposition says that if the associative law is true, there is a unique "answer" for the sum of ANY number of integers, a1 + a2 + a3 + ... + an, and the answer does not depend how you split the sum up into pairs of numbers using ()'s.
 
AlephZero said:
Here's a simple example, using addition of real numbers.

You only define what addition means for adding two numbers (not more than two).

The associative law says that (x + y) + z = x + (y + z) for any three numbers x, y, and z.

The proposition says that if the associative law is true, there is a unique "answer" for the sum of ANY number of integers, a1 + a2 + a3 + ... + an, and the answer does not depend how you split the sum up into pairs of numbers using ()'s.

thank you very much :)
I have understood :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K