What is the minimum height for an object to complete a loop without friction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ishaan S
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loop Sliding
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving an object sliding without friction along a looped track. Participants are exploring the minimum height required for the object to complete a loop and the conditions under which it loses contact with the track.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation of energy and centripetal acceleration principles to determine the minimum height for completing a loop. Some participants question the assumption that the velocity is zero when the object leaves the track, prompting further exploration of the forces involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing feedback on each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the assumptions made in the calculations, and there is a progression towards refining the understanding of the forces at play as the object moves along the track.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the conditions necessary for maintaining contact with the track, particularly at the top of the loop, and the implications of energy conservation in the context of the problem.

Ishaan S
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
A small mass m slides without friction along the looped apparatus shown in the attached file. (a) If the object is to remain on the track, even at the top of the circle(whose radius is r), from what minimum height hm must it be released(from rest)? (b) If it is released at a height h = 0.80hm, at what height will it lose contact with the track?

2. Homework Equations
ac = v2/r

KE = .5mv2

PEgrav = mgh
3. The Attempt at a Solution
For a:

I knew that for the object to complete the loop, it must be able to complete the extreme case: the top. I knew that the centripetal acceleration must be g. Therefore, from the centripetal acceleration formula, the speed had to be at least v = √(rg).

From the law of the conservation of energy, I equated the initial and final(at the top of the loop) energies:

mghm = 2rmg + .5mv2

I canceled out the m and substituted v from the centripetal acceleration equation and got

ghm = 2rg + .5rg = 2.5rg

Cancel out g

hm = 2.5r

For b:

The initial height .80hm = 2r.

Using the law of the conservation of energy

2rmg = mgh + .5m(0)2.

I substituted 0 for v in the equation above because I thought that the velocity had to be 0 when the object left the track.

Solving for h, I got h = 2r.

I have no idea if this is right. Could someone please tell me if this is right, and if not, give me a nudge in the right direction.

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • 20150313_163507 (1).jpg
    20150313_163507 (1).jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 601
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, Ishaan.

Your work for part (a) looks very good!

For part (b) your assumption that v = 0 when the mass leaves the track is not correct. Hint: What force on the mass must go to zero at the instant the mass leaves the track?
 
Ok.

So I set up an equation.

Fnormal + mgcosθ = mv2/r

where θ is the angle between the normal force and the gravitational force.

I set Fnormal equal to zero because when the object leaves the track, the normal force would be 0.

mgcosθ = mv2/r

I solved for v2.

v2 = rgcosθ

I then set up the conservation of energy equation.

2rmg = mgh + mv2/2.

I substituted rgcosθ for v2 due to my previous derivation. I then canceled mg from both sides.

2r = h + r(cosθ)/2,

Then I set up a diagram that I have attached.

I solved for cosθ using the diagram and substituted it into the above equation.

2r = h + (h-r)/2.

I solved for h and got

h = (5/3)r.

Is this correct?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • 20150313_175914.jpg
    20150313_175914.jpg
    40.2 KB · Views: 487
That all looks correct. Very nice work!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K