What is the minimum mass of a neutron star?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The minimum mass of a neutron star is currently debated, with theoretical limits ranging from 0.7 to 3.6 solar masses. Observational data indicates that the least massive known neutron star, PSR J0453+1559, has a mass of 1.174 ± 0.004 M⊙, while the most massive, PSR J0348+0432, is approximately 2.01 ± 0.04 M⊙. The recent neutron star merger event has established an upper mass limit of 2.16 solar masses, but the lower limit remains uncertain. The Chandrasekhar Limit, traditionally set at 1.44 M⊙, is also under scrutiny as new findings suggest neutron stars may exist below this threshold.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutron star physics
  • Familiarity with the Chandrasekhar Limit
  • Knowledge of Oppenheimer-Volkoff calculations
  • Awareness of pulsar mass measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit on neutron star mass
  • Explore the relationship between neutron stars and white dwarfs
  • Investigate the methods used in measuring pulsar masses
  • Study the effects of gravitational waves on neutron star mass estimation
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying stellar evolution and compact objects will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on neutron star characteristics and mass limits.

  • #31
PeterDonis said:
I don't have my copy of Shapiro & Teukolsky handy

I do. They give 0.18 solar masses under Harrison-Wheeler EOS. The Oppenheimer and Volkoff EOS has no lower bound. The reason they don't spring back to white dwarfs is, as you say, that this requires work, and the energy to do that work has already left the system.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stefan r
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
I've found this paper which probably meets my needs:

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/66
Equation (3) gives a range at formation for an isolated NS as:

M_birth∼1.08–1.57M_☉

Presumably a star exceeding the Chandrasekhar limit would start to collapse but the implosion of the core could eject some surface material to leave a remnant slightly below the limit.

In binary systems, mass transfer raises the mass of the first NS formed as the companion sheds so they have a different distribution with a higher mean (see figure 2) but I don't see any way the mass could be reduced significantly after formation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PAllen

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K