What is the minimum speed needed for a pendulum mass to reach its highest point?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The minimum speed required for a pendulum mass to reach its highest point is derived from energy conservation principles. The correct formula for the initial velocity (Vo) is Vo = √(3gL + 2gLcos(θ)), where g is the acceleration due to gravity, L is the length of the pendulum, and θ is the angle with respect to the vertical. The discussion highlights the importance of considering both potential and kinetic energy at the highest point of the pendulum's swing. The initial setup neglected the necessary kinetic energy at the peak, which is crucial for maintaining circular motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Familiarity with pendulum motion and circular motion dynamics
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations and solving for variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy conservation equations in pendulum systems
  • Learn about circular motion dynamics and the forces acting on objects in motion
  • Explore the concept of critical velocity in circular motion scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of varying angles on pendulum motion and energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding pendulum dynamics and energy conservation in motion.

OVB
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
A mass is attached to a pendulum of length L that is at an angle theta (8) with respect to the normal. The mass has an initial velocity Vo. What is the minimum speed (symbolically) needed for the mass to go all the way down to its lowest point and all the way back up its highest point (as in, the rope of the pendulum is projected vertically upwards).

I set 1/2(m)Vo^2 + mgL(1-cos(8)) = 2mgL

and got Vo = square root of 2gL + 2gLcos(8), but my book says it is the square root of 3gL + 2gLcos(8). I don't see what's wrong with my set up, as I have checked the result of this set up several times and got the same answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no, I meant that it was originally at an angle with respect to what it would be at rest (i.e., bob below pivot) , and the velocity is supposed to be like that since it is supposed to be solved symbolically.
 
OVB said:
no, I meant that it was originally at an angle with respect to what it would be at rest (i.e., bob below pivot) , and the velocity is supposed to be like that since it is supposed to be solved symbolically.
OOPs. I inadvertantly deleted my first message. And OOPs again, I did misinterpret the potential energy term in your original equation. You are quite correct about the initial potential energy. However, I was correct that you have neglected the velocity that the bob must have at the higest point. The bob cannot possibly reach that point with zero velocity. In order to reach that point, the bob must travel on a circular path. The net force at the top of the circle must be just enough to keep it in circular motion. If the bob had zero kinetic energy at the top, it would fall straight down, but it could never even get to the top if it didn't have enough kinetic energy in the first place. You need a kinetic energy term on the right hand side of your equation, and you need to find the velocity from circular motion considerations.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K