What is the most beautiful definition you've encountered?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tgt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "beautiful definitions" in mathematics and physics, exploring various definitions that participants find aesthetically pleasing or significant. The scope includes theoretical definitions, mathematical constructs, and philosophical reflections on the nature of definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the definition of a free basis in group theory is beautiful.
  • One participant appreciates the formula for the perpendicular distance from a point to a line in coordinate geometry.
  • Several participants discuss the definition of the number e, particularly its property that d/dx (e^x) = e^x, and the implications of this definition.
  • There is a debate about whether certain expressions, such as e = lim (1+1/n)^n, qualify as definitions.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the concept of a "beautiful" definition, questioning how a definition can possess beauty compared to proofs or theorems.
  • Participants mention Gauss' definition of congruence classes mod m as a beautiful definition.
  • Euler's identity, e^{i \pi} + 1 = 0, is cited as beautiful, though its status as a definition is questioned.
  • One participant reflects on the nature of definitions, suggesting they express the intuition of mathematicians and serve as a starting point for deduction.
  • Another participant mentions the definition of a set as a collection of distinct objects, highlighting its appeal.
  • There are discussions about the definition of a point in relation to physics and its historical context from Euclid.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on what constitutes a beautiful definition, with no consensus on specific definitions or the criteria for beauty. Some definitions are appreciated while others are contested, indicating a diversity of views.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that definitions may not uniquely define certain concepts, such as e^x, and that the beauty of a definition may depend on its implications and the context in which it is used.

  • #31
I don't know if I find the definition of a topological space beautiful in itself, but the whole abstractization of the "theory of the neighborhood" (i.e. freeing it from epsilons!) is certainly a beautiful feat of the mind. Although yes, since the definition of a topological space captures the essence of the idea of a neighborhood and all its power in 3 simple yet mysterious axioms, then I can definitely see how it has some beauty in itself! I guess it's my favorite definitions too then.

Not a mathematical dfn but it appears in an old absolutely beautiful philosophy book attempting to explain the human mind by starting from a handful of definition and axioms about the most elementary but fundamental concepts about the universe and working upwards by means of the "Lemma, Theorem, Corolary" formula. This is one of the first definitions of the book I think:

"Per aeternitatem, intelligo ipsam existensiam" (By eternity, I mean existence itself)

:!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I don't know if this is ok, but It's just amazing

Euler's Identity:

e^i*pi = -1

It relates the exponential base which is found with calculus, the imaginary unit which literally has to be made up to solve functions where there are no real solutions, and pi, which links all of geometry together. And it all equals -1!

It relates algebra, geometry and calculus to the most basic number.
 
  • #33
i agree that the free basis definition is typical of the most beautiful definitions, namely definitions by universal mapping properties.
 
  • #34
mathwonk said:
i agree that the free basis definition is typical of the most beautiful definitions, namely definitions by universal mapping properties.

It took ages to understand them. Do you know who invented them?
 
  • #35
i believe peter freyd, in his book on categories and functors, credits maclane with this type of definition in a paper on groups.
 
  • #36
Continuity in the way I first heard it:

A funtion f:A\subseteq\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} is continuous if, for each x\in A and each \varepsilon>0, we can find some \delta>0 such that |f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon whenever |x-y|<\delta.

I know a lot of people tend not to like it when they first see it, but it was the first time I saw a mathematician take something so intuative then transform it into a solid mathematical form. That gave me a love of analysis/topology that I still hold. An alternative for me would possibly be the definition of the fundamental group.
 
  • #37
what about the definition where f^-1(U) is open whenever U is open.
 
  • #38
I like the classical form (I think because I have the memory "wow, maths can be beautiful" associated to it, rather than its intrinsic genius) but I can see why you like the more topological version.
 
  • #39
compactness: every open cover has a finite subcover
 
  • #40
I like the definition of NP the best. Easy to verify, hard to solve.
 
  • #41
EternalVortex said:
I like the definition of NP the best. Easy to verify, hard to solve.

That's a good one.
 
  • #42
All those cohomology business. It's hard to believe how much antisymmetry (of simplexes, tensor products..etc) gives you... Stokes theorem, De Rham's theorem and what not...even though I haven't fully understood them yet.
 
  • #43
The definition of Lebesgue integral as well. To understand how Riez representation theorem falls right out of it is amazing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K