MHB What is the most motivating way to introduce primitive roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matqkks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primitive Roots
AI Thread Summary
To effectively introduce primitive roots and the order of an integer modulo n to first-year undergraduate students, start with relatable concepts like clock arithmetic. Use simple, everyday examples to illustrate modulo operations, such as determining the time after a certain number of hours. Gradually increase complexity by introducing different moduli, like modulo 24 for time of day and modulo 7 for days of the week. Once students are comfortable with these basics, transition to formal definitions and laws of modular arithmetic. This approach not only builds understanding but also highlights the relevance of number theory in practical applications.
matqkks
Messages
280
Reaction score
5
I am teaching elementary number theory to first year undergraduate students. How do introduce the order of an integer modulo n and primitive roots? How do I make this a motivating topic and are there any applications of this area? I am looking at something which will have an impact.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would say build it up slowly, using concrete examples they can all understand. The simplest example would be clock arithmetic as time is surely something they must all deal with every day.

Though the students are undergraduates, let’s assume they are starting at the very basic level, with no prior knowledge of the subject whatsoever. Start by asking them the simplest of questions, say: “It is 9 o’clock now and I have an appointment in 5 hours’ time. What time is my appointment?” Most of them should have no difficulty working out the answer themselves. Now ask them a slightly more complicated one: “If it’s 9 o’clock now, what time will it be in 50 hours’ time?” Now they have to subtract a multiple of 12 rather than just 12. Explain to them that this is the principle of modulo-12 arithmetic.

Now tell them we can do modular arithmetic in numbers other than 12. For example, if they have to calculate not just the time but the time of the day (i.e. whether it’s a.m. or p.m.) then they’re working modulo 24 rather than 12. Another example would be modulo 7 for days of the week: “It’s Monday today; what day of the week will it be in 100 days’ time?” Give them a few similar examples to work out for themselves. They should begin to grasp the connection between the arithmetics of modulo 12, 24 and 7.

Once they have the right feel for the topic, it’s time for serious work. Define modular arithmetic formally, derive the basic laws (if $a\equiv b\pmod n$ and $c\equiv d\pmod n$ then $a+b\equiv c+d\pmod n$, and so on) and establish other important results. This should gradually build up to increasingly complex topics in modular-arithmetic number theory.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top