MHB What is the multiplier for finding the area of triangle ADG?

alextrainer
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Not sure how to use a single area and line segments that are same to calculate the areas and line segments for the areas.
 

Attachments

  • geo prob stacked.jpg
    geo prob stacked.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 103
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Using the formula for the area, $A$, of a triangle

$$A=\frac{bh}{2}$$

where $b$ is the base of the triangle and $h$ is the height of the triangle, can you state the area of triangle $CDE$ in terms of $AG$ and $DG$?
 
(3)42 = 84/2 so b times h equals 84
 
$$\frac{\frac13AG\cdot\frac13DG}{2}=42$$

Now, what number can we multiply both sides of the above equation by to find $\triangle{ADG}$?
 
greg1313 said:
$$\frac{\frac13AG\cdot\frac13DG}{2}=42$$

Now, what number can we multiply both sides of the above equation by to find $\triangle{ADG}$?

Greg, I'm glad you can read that tiny sideways image, because I sure can't. (Bandit)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
59
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top