What is the necessary and sufficient condition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Helly123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Condition
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the conditions for the inequality |x-2| < a to be necessary and sufficient for the quadratic inequality x^2 - 3x - 10 < 0. It is established that the correct range for x satisfying the quadratic inequality is -2 < x < 5. The necessary condition for |x-2| < a is determined to be 0 < a ≤ 3, while the sufficient condition can be satisfied with a range of values for a, specifically 0 < a < 4. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the implications of these inequalities and clarifies that no necessary condition exists for |x-2| < a that would restrict a to values greater than or equal to 4. The conclusion emphasizes the need for careful analysis of the relationships between the conditions presented.
  • #31
If you pick ## a=4## then
<br /> \lvert x-2 \rvert &lt; 4 \iff -4 &lt; x-2 &lt; 4 \iff -2 &lt;x&lt;6<br />
 
  • Like
Likes Helly123
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
nuuskur said:
f you pick, say, ## a=1##, then the implication
<br /> (x+2)(x-5)&lt;0 \implies -1&lt;x&lt;3<br />
is false. We can pick ##x = -1.5##, it still stands that ##(x+2)(x-5)<0 ##, but at the same time ##x\leq -1##.
Ok, the implication is still false and the same counter-example works, but I should go back to primary school, because elementary arithmetic is, at times, an impossible task. It should be for ## a=1##
<br /> (x+2)(x-5)&lt;0 \implies 1&lt;x&lt;3<br />
Now, any ##x\in (-2,1]\cup [3,5) ## works as a counter-example.

but I am certain now that this is correct
:DD
 
Last edited:
  • #33
nuuskur said:
Ok, the implication is still false and the same counter-example works, but I should go back to primary school, because elementary arithmetic is, at times, an impossible task. It should be for ## a=1##
<br /> (x+2)(x-5)&lt;0 \implies 1&lt;x&lt;3<br />
Now, any ##x\in (-2,1]\cup [3,5) ## works as a counter-example.

but I am certain now that this is correct
:DD
Ok thanks
 
  • #34
SammyS said:
Yes.
For | x − 2 | < a to be a sufficient condition so that x2 − 3x − 10 < 0, the range for a is 0 < a ≤ 3.
You have not been very clear in showing that this is the case.

This does not give all of the values of x which satisfy the given quadratic inequality. Rather any x fulfilling | x − 2 | < a will satisfy the quadratic inequality.for the specified range of a values. So being in that interval is a sufficient condition for x to satisfy the quadratic inequality..
I'm still hung up on the original problem statement which says x2 − 3x − 10 < 10. Did we decide somewhere that this was in error?
 
  • #35
tnich said:
I'm still hung up on the original problem statement which says x2 − 3x − 10 < 10. Did we decide somewhere that this was in error?
Yes. I made mistake. It supposed to be x^2 - 3x - 10 < 0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K