What is the Origin of Eukarya and Its Relationship to Bacteria and Archaea?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SW VandeCarr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    domains Evolution
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The origin of Eukarya is primarily attributed to a fusion event between an archaeon and a bacterium, leading to the development of mitochondria through endosymbiosis. Current evidence supports the two-domain model, suggesting that eukaryotes evolved from within the domain Archaea, contrary to the traditional three-domain model. The divergence of eukaryotes is estimated to have occurred around 2.8 billion years ago, although some interpretations of evidence have led to misconceptions regarding this timeline. Ongoing research continues to explore the complexities of this evolutionary relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of endosymbiosis and its role in cellular evolution
  • Familiarity with the two-domain and three-domain models of life
  • Knowledge of the significance of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor)
  • Basic concepts of microbial culturing techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the endosymbiotic theory and its implications for eukaryotic evolution
  • Explore the latest findings on Lokiarchaeota and its relationship to Eukarya
  • Study the differences between the two-domain and three-domain models of life
  • Investigate current methodologies for culturing archaea and their challenges
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, evolutionary scientists, microbiologists, and anyone interested in the origins of complex cellular life and the evolutionary relationships between domains of life.

SW VandeCarr
Messages
2,193
Reaction score
77
I'm wondering if the issue of bacteria and archaea having a single last universal common ancestor (LUCA) with eukarya diverging later, or all three having distinct common ancestors, has been clarified. I've seen a number of texts indicating the eukarya diverged much later, but also some indicating much earlier origin of eukarya.

http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v8/n10/fig_tab/nrmicro2426_F1.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855935/
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
The current picture for the evolution of eukaroytes is that they arose from a fusion between an archaeon and a bacterium (which would give rise to mitochondria) through a process called endosymbiosis. Previously there had been some debate whether the host before fusion occurred was a geniune archaeon or a species outside of archaea, but most evidence points to eukaryotes having arisen from within archaea. Therefore, the two domain model is probably most correct though many textbooks still teach the three domain model (which treats us as eukaryotes as our own special domain rather than some subset of domain archaea).

For more discussion see these previous PF threads on the topic as well as the papers they reference:
Are there really three domains of life? discusses a nice review article on the topic
Lokiarchaeota and the Evolution of Complex Cellular Life discusses a paper identifying a new species of archaea that is likely very similar to the one that gave rise to eukarya.
A Ring of Life and https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/when-did-https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/when-did-mitochondria-evolve/-evolve/ discuss the evolution of eukaryotes and endosymbiosis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara, BillTre and SW VandeCarr
Thanks. That was my belief, but I had come across articles supporting the 3 domain model. Some state that eukarya originated 2.8 billion years ago, but that seems to be based on a misinterpretation (or contamination) of evidence.
 
Well, that is very interesting @Ygggdrasil.
I was no longer upto date on this stuff.

By the way, I found a free access version of this article:
Ygggdrasil said:
Lokiarchaeota and the Evolution of Complex Cellular Life discusses a paper identifying a new species of archaea that is likely very similar to the one that gave rise to eukarya.
Here.

It seems no one has identified these cells yet though.
Too bad!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ygggdrasil
BillTre said:
It seems no one has identified these cells yet though.
Hopefully someone is working on this. Of course, culturing microbes in the laboratory can be quite tricky, so it may take a while before someone is successful.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K