What is the physical difference between compression waves and longitud

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between compression waves and longitudinal waves in the context of acoustics. Both terms describe waves where particle velocity is parallel to group velocity, but they are defined differently in terms of phase speed calculations. The phase speed for compression waves is given by the formula c_P = √((λ + 2μ)/ρ), while for longitudinal waves it is c_L = √((E(1 - ν))/((1 + ν)(1 - 2ν)ρ)). The ratio of their speeds is c_P/c_L = √((1 - ν)/((1 + ν)(1 - 2ν))), indicating a mathematical distinction that was initially misunderstood by participants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and acoustics
  • Familiarity with elastic constants, specifically Lamé parameters (λ and μ)
  • Knowledge of phase speed calculations in materials
  • Basic grasp of Poisson's ratio (ν) and Young's modulus (E)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physical properties of compression and longitudinal waves in different materials
  • Study the implications of Poisson's ratio on wave propagation
  • Explore the differences between quasi-longitudinal waves and standard longitudinal waves
  • Learn about the applications of wave speed calculations in engineering and material science
USEFUL FOR

Acoustics professionals, physicists, and engineering students interested in wave propagation and material properties will benefit from this discussion.

mikelotinga
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, this is my first post on this forum so nice to be here, and I'll be very appreciative of any responses. My background is in acoustics, and hence my question is relevant to vibration propagation.

The terms 'compression' and 'longitudinal' are both frequently used to describe the same type of wave; namely one in which the direction of particle velocity is parallel to that of the group velocity.

However, in some texts I have seen a distinction drawn between the two, and two different formulae used to calculate the wave phase speed.

I will reproduce the two definitions in terms of the classical elastic constants sometimes known as the Lamé parameters ##\lambda## and ##\mu##. I define these constants using Poisson's ratio ##\nu##, and the elastic (Young's, wrongly attributed) modulus, ##E##.

$$\lambda = \frac{\nu E}{(1 + \nu)(1 - 2\nu)}$$

$$\mu = \frac{E}{2(1 + \nu)}$$

For COMPRESSION (dilatational) waves, Ewing & Jardetsky, 1957 (Elastic Waves in Layered Media, available free at https://archive.org/details/elasticwavesinla032682mbp - see Chapter 1, pages 8 and 9 in particular) give the formula for the phase speed ##c_P## in terms of ##\lambda##, ##\mu## and the material mass density ##\rho## as

$$c_P = \sqrt{\frac{\lambda + 2\mu}{\rho}}$$

For LONGITUDINAL waves, Cremer, Heckl and Petersson, 2005 (Structure-borne Sound, see this page and this page, noting that, in this volume, Poisson's ratio is denoted as ##\mu##) give the formula for the phase speed ##c_L## as

$$c_L = \sqrt{\frac{E(1 - \nu)}{(1 + \nu)(1 - 2\nu)\rho}}$$

which is, in terms of ##\lambda##

$$c_L = \sqrt{\frac{\lambda(1 - \nu)}{\nu\rho}}$$

The distinction between the compression wave phase speed and the longitudinal wave phase speed is therefore, as pointed out by Remington, Kurzweil and Towers, 1987 (Low-Frequency Noise and Vibration from Trains, Chapter 16 of the Transportation Noise Reference Book, edited by Paul Nelson, available here, see page 16/8, i.e. page 8 of chapter 16)

$$\frac{c_P}{c_L} = \sqrt{\frac{1 - \nu}{(1 + \nu)(1 - 2\nu)}}$$

Please note the longitudinal wave here is NOT the quasi-longitudinal wave found in relatively thin objects such as plates and bars, which have a different set of phase speeds again.

Now, 'compression' and 'longitudinal' appear to be bandied about as interchangeable terms for the same wave, but this analysis suggests this is not the case. Can anyone explain what the difference is in a physical, rather than mathematical sense?

Many thanks,

Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hello mike! welcome to pf! :smile:
mikelotinga said:
$$\lambda = \frac{\nu E}{(1 + \nu)(1 - 2\nu)}$$

$$\mu = \frac{E}{2(1 + \nu)}$$

so $$\lambda + 2\mu = \frac{E}{(1 + \nu)(1 - 2\nu)}(\nu + 1 - 2\nu)$$ :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
hi mike! :smile:
mikelotinga said:
… Where would one find this distinction between compression and longitudinal waves?

what diffference?? :confused:

i'm saying they're the same …​
mikelotinga said:
$$c_P = \sqrt{\frac{\lambda + 2\mu}{\rho}}$$

$$c_L = \sqrt{\frac{E(1 - \nu)}{(1 + \nu)(1 - 2\nu)\rho}}$$
 
Hi Tim,

tiny-tim said:
hello mike! welcome to pf! :smile:

so $$\lambda + 2\mu = \frac{E}{(1 + \nu)(1 - 2\nu)}(\nu + 1 - 2\nu)$$ :wink:

Thanks for the welcome and for pointing out that, by the definitions of ##c_P## and ##c_L## in my post, in fact,

$$c_P = c_L$$

so there IS no mathematical distinction. I can see what happened. In the Remington text I mentioned, they use the definition

$$c_L = \sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{E}}{\rho}}$$

I've put the ##E## in bold because, since they neglect to define ##\mathbf{E}##, I assumed (wrongly), that their ##\mathbf{E}## was the same as the ##D## used in the Cremer text, where ##D = \lambda(1 - \nu)/\nu = \lambda + 2\mu## as you've helpfully shown. Rather, working through from their ratio of ##c_P/c_L##, it seems they DO actually mean ##c_L = \sqrt{E/\rho}## where ##E## IS the elastic modulus.

SO (deep breath), to rephrase the question, can anyone explain WHAT a so-called 'longitudinal' wave with a phase speed of

$$c = \sqrt{\frac{E}{\rho}}$$

is, and how it differs (physically) from the normal definition of a compression or longitudinal wave?

Thanks a lot!

:)
 
mikelotinga said:
SO (deep breath), to rephrase the question, can anyone explain WHAT a so-called 'longitudinal' wave with a phase speed of

$$c = \sqrt{\frac{E}{\rho}}$$

is, and how it differs (physically) from the normal definition of a compression or longitudinal wave?

:)

Ah, got it, contrary to the bottom part of my original post, this last one IS the equation for the phase speed of a quasi-longitudinal wave in a bar.

Sorry to waste your time, puzzle solved!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
555
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
657
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
775
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K