man@SUT
- 14
- 0
I am a new member of the forum. I don't understand the physical meaning of the form factor. Could you help me?
The discussion centers around the concept of form factor, particularly in the context of high energy physics, electronics, and PC-engineering. Participants explore its definitions, implications, and various interpretations within these fields.
Participants express varying interpretations of form factor, with no consensus on a singular definition or understanding. Confusion remains regarding the relationship between invariant amplitude and mass.
Some claims depend on specific definitions and contexts, such as the application of form factor in different areas of physics. The discussion also highlights unresolved questions about the relationship between invariant amplitudes and mass.
Individuals interested in high energy physics, quantum mechanics, and the mathematical underpinnings of particle interactions may find this discussion relevant.
Well, i guess there are other ways to look at it but the basic idea will be the "link to strength of interaction". I know there is also a topological explanation where you can plot the form factor as a surface. The deformation of that surface during an interaction gives an idea about what is going on and how strong that interaction is. In QHD (quantum hadro dynamics), this is used very often.man@SUT said:Thank you, Malon. I found this in the cross section of e-e+ to vector meson. Is there another meaning of form factor in high energy physics.
Mass ? Keep in mind that mass is not the coupling constant of electromagnetic or (in general) weak interactions. Again, read the definition in the paper, the key notion is the "squared four momentum Q² dependency" .man@SUT said:For invariant amplitude and invariant mass amplitude, I think they are the same. We calculate them on the way to find the cross section. So, how does it relate to mass if both are the same? I am a bit confused.