Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the physical meaning of the torsion tensor in general relativity, particularly focusing on its indices and implications in various theoretical frameworks, including extensions of general relativity. Participants explore the conceptual and mathematical aspects of torsion, its representation, and its significance in the context of gravitational theories.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions the physical meaning of the three indices of the torsion tensor, suggesting they might represent spatial directions related to translation and rotation.
- Another participant references a paper indicating that a positive component of the torsion tensor leads to a specific rotational behavior of parallel transported vectors, implying a connection between the indices and spatial directions.
- Several participants express confusion regarding the presence and removal of previous answers in the thread, indicating a lack of clarity in the ongoing discussion.
- A participant mentions their limited knowledge of torsion and notes that existing literature, such as Wald's textbook, provides little information on the topic.
- Another participant seeks guidance on deriving the field equations related to torsion in the Einstein-Cartan theory, indicating a gap in available resources or explanations.
- A later contribution discusses the historical context of torsion in physical theories and the challenges in interpreting its geometric meaning, contrasting finite and infinitesimal perspectives.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
The discussion reflects multiple competing views on the interpretation and implications of the torsion tensor, with no consensus reached on its physical meaning or the appropriate mathematical treatment.
Contextual Notes
Participants express uncertainty regarding the availability of comprehensive resources on torsion and its mathematical derivation, highlighting limitations in existing literature and the complexity of the topic.