Ahsan Khan
- 270
- 5
Its ovais :-), HeheheDr Ross said:Ovalis
Dr Ross said:it helped me to consider the electric field as a sort of vacuum that sucks electrons in its direction.
I don't know why you change a well known fact that electric field sucks positive charge(not the negative charge particles like electron) in its direction. It is very well known fact that force on positive charge is in the direction of electric field and that on negative charge in opposite direction.
Dr Ross said:Nascent and Alex gave (imo) helpful, clear, and simple information.
All are saying same thing without explaining me how can the side(P side) with negative ions act as higher potential while the side(N side) with positive ions act as lower potential. Field is from positive side to negative side, right?
In Pn junction positive charge is on N side and negative charge is on P side, right?
So field must be from N to P side, right?
Potential decreases in the direction of field, right?
As field is directed towards P, P side should have low potential than N side.
But text is showing reverse if you actually applied kirchhoffs law, in those circuit you will notice it.
Which is where I feel contradiction between concepts I learn and how the things were solved.
Dr Ross said:About the Kirchoff solution, I suggest changing the sign on your diode junction's emf.
If you read what I wrote above, my concepts shows junctions emf with sign on P side negative and N side positive. But book uses reverse thing.
I want you teach me reasons why I should change the sign of my diode junction? I must be missing something otherwise.
Regards, thanks a bunch :)