What is the position of a particle moving under gravity and a retarding force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leviathanX777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Particle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle moving vertically under the influence of gravity and a retarding force proportional to the square of its velocity. The original poster attempts to derive the position of the particle over time, given specific conditions and equations related to acceleration and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of acceleration to find velocity and subsequently position, questioning the application of certain mathematical techniques, such as handling a first-order separable ordinary differential equation (ODE).

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the integration process and the need to correctly apply the principles of ODEs. There are ongoing attempts to clarify misunderstandings regarding the integration of variable functions and the implications of the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific integration techniques and hints provided within the problem context, including the use of trigonometric identities and logarithmic functions. Participants are also reflecting on their previous calculus knowledge and its application to the current problem.

leviathanX777
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
1. A particle moves vertically under gravity and a retarding force proportional to the square of its velocity. If v is upward or downward speed, shot that a = +/-g -kv^2, where k is a constant. If the particle is moving upwards, show that its position at time t is given by;

z = z0 +(1/k)lncos[rootgk (t0-t)] where z0 and t0 are integration constants.




Homework Equations





3. I proved the a = +/-g -kv^2 but I spent almost an hour looking at the next part with no results. I integrated twice to get x(t) = -gt^2/2 - kv^2t^2/2 + z0 + t0

I have no idea what to do after this, I mean I don't know how you bring the cos into the problem. This hint is also given; lncosx = -1/2 ln(1 + tan^2x)

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leviathanX777 said:
I integrated twice to get x(t) = -gt^2/2 - kv^2t^2/2 + z0 + t0[/b]

I have no idea what to do after this, I mean I don't know how you bring the cos into the problem. This hint is also given; lncosx = -1/2 ln(1 + tan^2x)

Cheers

How exactly are you integrating [itex]-kv^2[/itex] with respect to time, if [itex]v(t)[/itex] is some unknown function of time?:wink:

Instead, realize that [itex]a(t)=\frac{dv}{dt}=-g-kv^2[/itex]...which gives you a separable 1st order ODE...surely you've come across those before?:wink:
 
Oh yes sorry I thought for some reason you could just integrate it with respect to time. But I don't see how changing it into a first order would help with the problem.
 
Have you not studied 1st order separable ODEs in any of your calculus courses yet?
 
Yes we did them last year but I don't see how doing that will bring tan into the question.
 
Solve the ODE for v(t) and then use the fact that [itex]v(t)=\frac{dz}{dt}[/itex] to solve your resulting equation for z(t)...
 
Alright cheers, will try that.
 
Did it but I knew that a(t) = dv/dt anyway
Still got the same results when I integrated
 
If you show me your steps, I can point out your error(s)...
 
  • #10
a(t) = dv/dt = -g-kv^2
integrate, v(t) = -gt -kv^2t + t0

integrate again to achieve z(t):

Z(t) = -gt^2 - kv^t^2 + z0
 
  • #11
leviathanX777 said:
a(t) = dv/dt = -g-kv^2
integrate, v(t) = -gt -kv^2t + t0

No, you are making the same mistake you did in your first attempt...

[tex]\int kv^2dt=kv^2t[/tex]

only if v(t) is a constant...which it clearly isn't.

Open up your old calc text and review how to solve separable 1st order ODEs.
 
  • #12
Ah yes, sorry I totally forgot what to do, didn't realize. Here's my solution;

dv/dt = -g -kv^2
integral(dv/-g-kv^2) = integral(dt)
integral[(-1/g+kv^2)(dv)] = integral(dt)
-1/k*integral[v^2 + (root(g/k)^2)] = integral(dt)
Used math's tables; integral(1/x^2 + a^2) = 1/a inversetan x/a

Cancelled terms etc, v = dz/dt

Got z;
z = zo - root(g)/root(k) ln [cos(root(gk))(to-t)]

However the answer should be;
z = zo + (1/k) ln [cos(root(gk))(to-t)]

Any ideas?
 
  • #13
Looks like you might have forgotten the factor of [itex]1/a[/itex] from

[tex]\int\frac{1}{v^2+a^2}dv=\frac{1}{a}\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{v}{a}\right)+C[/tex]

...but unless you post the rest of your steps I can't tell for sure.
 
  • #14
I didn't;
when applying that inverse tan I got;

-1/k[root(k)/root(g) inversetan(v*root(k)/root(g))] = T-To
 
  • #15
Okay, and what did you get when you solved that equation for v(t)?
 
  • #16
v(t) = root(g)/root(k) * tan (root(gk)*T1)

where T1 = T-T0
 
  • #17
What happened to the negative sign you had before?
 
  • #18
I just changed it mutiplied across by -1 and got; -T + T0 on the right hand side which I called T1
 
  • #19
Okay, so now you have

[tex]v(t)=\frac{dz}{dt}=\sqrt{\frac{g}{k}}\tan\left(\sqrt{gk}(t_0-t)\right)[/tex]

Now use the variable substitution [itex]u=\sqrt{gk}(t_0-t)[/itex] to integrate the RHS...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K