What is the Potential of a Given Function Independent of Path?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the potential function for the vector field F = [2x(y^3 - z^3), 3x^2y^2, -3x^2z^2], which is independent of path. The initial attempt at finding the potential function f(x,y,z) led to an incorrect conclusion due to miscalculations in the partial derivatives. The correct potential function is identified as f(x,y,z) = x^2y^3 - x^2z^3, confirming that the term h(z) is unnecessary. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately applying partial differentiation in multivariable calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and potential functions
  • Proficiency in multivariable calculus, specifically partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with the concept of path independence in vector calculus
  • Basic knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of conservative vector fields and their potential functions
  • Learn about the application of the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals
  • Explore advanced techniques in partial differentiation and their implications
  • Practice solving problems involving path independence in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, or engineering who are working with vector calculus and need to understand potential functions and path independence.

SlideMan
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to determine the potential of the following function:

F = [2x(y^3 - z^3), 3x^2y^2, -3x^2z^2]

The equation is given to be independent of path, and F \cdot dr = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = 2xy^3 - 2xz^3 \Rightarrow f(x,y,z) = x^2y^3 - x^2z^3 + g(y,z)

\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = 3x^2y^2 = 3x^2y^2 + \frac{\partial g}{\partial y} \Rightarrow g(y,z) = h(z)

\frac{\partial f}{\partial z} = -3x^2z^2 = \frac{\partial h}{\partial z} \Rightarrow h(z) = -x^2z^3

So, f(x,y,z) = x^2y^3 - 2x^2z^3

This answer doesn't check out. Taking the partial of f with respect to x, y, and z does not yield the initial equation. What am I missing? Is there a better way to go about this?

The correct answer turns out to be x^2y^3 - x^2z^3, which is my initial equation for f without h(z).

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SlideMan said:
1.

\frac{\partial f}{\partial z} = -3x^2z^2 = \frac{\partial h}{\partial z} \Rightarrow h(z) = -x^2z^3


I think you got this line wrong
 
^ OK...what am I missing?

Working backwards...

\frac{\partial}{\partial z}(-x^2z^3) = -3x^2z^2
 
\frac{\partial f}{\partial z} = -3x^2z^2 = -3x^2z^2 + \frac{\partial h}{\partial z} \Rightarrow h(z) = 0

Im having trouble with latex, but your partial f over partial z which is -3x^2z^2 = -3x^2z^2 + partial h over partial z. so, h(z) = 0=g(y,x)
 
Last edited:
^ Ahh...got it. I really shouldn't be doing this so late at night. :) Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K