MHB What is the Precise Meaning of dA=2xdx?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lamsung
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the meaning of the expression dA=2xdx, derived from the derivative dA/dx=2x, and questions its validity since dA/dx is not a fraction. Participants explore the relationship between derivatives and differentials, emphasizing that every equation has a specific meaning. The conversation also touches on the need for clear definitions of differentials to understand these expressions better. The distinction between derivatives and differentials is highlighted, suggesting that a more straightforward definition may aid comprehension. Overall, the thread seeks clarity on the mathematical implications of these expressions.
lamsung
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Every equation has a meaning.

For example, the area of a square with side x is given by A=x2.

Then dA/dx can be computed and is equal to 2x.

The expression dA/dx=2x means the instantaneous change of A when x increases from a is 2a.

However, what is the meaning of dA=2xdx?

dA/dx is not a fraction, why is it valid to say dA=2xdx from the premise dA/dx=2x?

Furthermore, can anyone explain the same questions for dx=dA/2x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lamsung said:
Every equation has a meaning.

For example, the area of a square with side x is given by A=x2.

Then dA/dx can be computed and is equal to 2x.

The expression dA/dx=2x means the instantaneous change of A when x increases from a is 2a.

However, what is the meaning of dA=2xdx?

dA/dx is not a fraction, why is it valid to say dA=2xdx from the premise dA/dx=2x?

Furthermore, can anyone explain the same questions for dx=dA/2x?

Hi lamsung, :)

Welcome to MHB! (Handshake)

The derivative and the differential can be separately defined and there are several approaches to define the differential precisely. You would find those definitions >>here<<. However a more simple (and less precise) definition for the differential can be found >>here<<.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
512