What Is the Pressure Distribution Inside a Hypothetical Liquid Planet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ApeXaviour
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid Planet
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the pressure distribution inside a hypothetical liquid planet with uniform density and no rotation. The pressure at a distance r from the center is derived using the formula p = ρGM(r/R³)(R-r), where g(r) is defined as GM(r/R³). The participants clarify that the initial assumption of zero pressure at the core is incorrect due to the variable nature of gravitational acceleration g, which is zero at the center. The final pressure equation is confirmed to equal zero at the planet's surface (r=R), indicating a correct understanding of hydrostatic equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrostatic pressure in fluids
  • Familiarity with Newton's law of gravitation
  • Basic calculus for integration
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration variations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of hydrostatic pressure in non-rotating fluids
  • Explore the implications of variable gravitational acceleration on fluid dynamics
  • Research the effects of temperature on the state of matter in hypothetical planets
  • Investigate models of planetary formation and their potential for supporting life
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, planetary scientists, and students interested in fluid dynamics and gravitational effects in celestial bodies.

ApeXaviour
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Okay obviously a hypothetical situation, this planet has a radius R, uniform density, and it doesn't rotate.

Pressure in a liquid is given by
p=\rho g d where d is the depth.

So the liquid pressure a distance r from the centre of the planet is.
p=\rho g (R-r) (where r<R)
But g is also a function of r. A little bit of fiddling with Newton's gravitation law gives:
g(r)=GM\frac{r}{R^3}
So...
p=\rho GM\frac{r}{R^3}(R-r)

This would mean, at r=0 the core of the planet is under zero pressure...! Em, I don't believe this to be correct, so what am I missing? am I slipping up somewhere? Am I putting too much stock in the formula: p=\rho g d?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your first equation is actually the result of a more general equation after some integration, it refers specifically to a column of liquid in which g remains constant. You need to go right back to the roots.

The reason you found pressure to be zero is because g is zero at the centre.
 
Last edited:
Hmm.. not sure why this was moved, it's not homework, I've actually just graduated. It's something I was debating with a friend.

Okay I see how it doesn't work as it assumes g is constant.

Okay back to basics, let me try again.
Pressure is force over area, in this case "weight" over area.

Taking a column of water between r and R, of height h and base area A. Taking an infinitesimal segment of the liquid at the top, it's weight is given by:
dF=\rho .A .g(r). dh
where g(r)=GM\frac{r}{R^3} and h = R-r
so dh=-dr
so now the total force/weight is F=\rho A GM \int_{R}^{r} -g(r) dr

So now pressure is:
p=\frac{F}{A}=\rho GM \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{R}-\frac{r^2}{R^3})

How does that look? I'm happier with it, as it appears to be max when r is zero and min when r is max.
 
Last edited:
It looks wrong to me, p should equal zero for r=R.
 
Good point, that didn't occur to me. But look at it again, it actually does equal zero when r=R. The bracketed part goes to (1/R - 1/R).

Hmm I'm pretty confident in it now. What do people think?
 
Why did you take a column of water? Especially if you're near the center, I assume you'd need to look at a sphere, as the force wouldn't all be pointing in the same direction as you move to points near where you're calculating
 
I don't quite see what you're getting at. It's static so the only force is gravitational, which is radial. Imagine the column as being very thin and pointing in a radial direction.
 
Oh yes so it is! silly me. Note that because M=rho*V you should be able to find a more elegant form of this equation.
 
Office_Shredder said:
Why did you take a column of water? Especially if you're near the center, I assume you'd need to look at a sphere, as the force wouldn't all be pointing in the same direction as you move to points near where you're calculating

It looks like he took infinitesimal concentric spheres of liquid and totaled up the force from each of these thin shells, which looks to me like it should work since the force is uniform and always pointing toward the center. Interesting problem!
 
Last edited:
  • #10
So how much?

Sooo . . . assuming an Earth mass world, how high is the pressure at the center? What is the density of the water there? Would it still be water or some sort of metal-like substance or what?
 
  • #11
Agua88 said:
Sooo . . . assuming an Earth mass world, how high is the pressure at the center? What is the density of the water there? Would it still be water or some sort of metal-like substance or what?

That would also depend on the temperature. We could put it in by hand, which would mean we could choose what phase we wanted. Or we could try coming up with a full model of the planet, but then we'd be constrained by reality.
 
  • #12
Temperature

Well with NASA about to publish a list of world types that might support life, and one of the types being a model made purely of water, I would think we would want to arrange it so that the surface temperature, under an earthlike atmosphere, would be around 80 degrees Fahrenheit or thereabouts. No idea what temperature that would make the interior.

We'd want to assume a standard rotation, not too different from that of Earth, to avoid weird freezing problems on the backside and such.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K