What is the probability of drawing cards from a deck?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability of drawing specific card combinations from a well-shuffled deck. The initial query involves determining the probability of drawing a 21 (an ace and a ten-valued card), with various participants providing insights into the calculations. There is clarification on the correct approach to probability equations, emphasizing the importance of counting methods and the use of factorials. A general formula for calculating probabilities of drawing multiple specific cards is also discussed, highlighting the use of binomial coefficients. The conversation concludes with a consensus on the correct methodologies for approaching these probability problems.
Probably
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
It's been some time since I studied probability. So, forgive me if this seems like a very simple question to answer, but after trying to wrap my head around it for two days without any success, I'm confident that once I understand it, the rest will become very clear.

Let me start with what I know:

Given a well-shuffled deck, what is the probability that the first hand drawn will be a 21 (an ace and a ten-valued card [T,J,Q,K])?

I know that drawing an ace will occur (4/52) and a ten will occur (16/51). Since the ten could have been drawn first, the probability is 2*(4/52)*(16/51) = 0.4827.

First question: Technically, should the equation be written as 2! * (4/52) * (16/51) = 0.4827 (note the factorial)?

Secondly, is there a generic form that allows me to calculate the probability of drawing cards? For example, drawing three 5s? Three aces and a four?

Am I correct for three 5s to write (4/52)*(3/51)*(2/50)*3! and (4/52)*(3/51)*(2/50)*(4/49)*4! for the three aces and a four?

I'm trying to write an algorithm to gather probabilities of drawing cards. I was surprised at being able to solve a subset sum problem earlier yet these basic probability problems elude me. :-/

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you miscounted:

There is a 4/52 chance of an ace in the first draw and a 16/51 of a 10-value on the second.

There is a 48/52 chance you didn't draw an ace first time ...
in which event, there is a 16/48 chance of a 10-value first and a 4/51 chance of an ace the second time.

Spot the difference.

afaik: there s no generic form apart from the kind of reasoning you just used.
 
Probably said:
It's been some time since I studied probability. So, forgive me if this seems like a very simple question to answer, but after trying to wrap my head around it for two days without any success, I'm confident that once I understand it, the rest will become very clear.

Let me start with what I know:

Given a well-shuffled deck, what is the probability that the first hand drawn will be a 21 (an ace and a ten-valued card [T,J,Q,K])?

I know that drawing an ace will occur (4/52) and a ten will occur (16/51). Since the ten could have been drawn first, the probability is 2*(4/52)*(16/51) = 0.4827.

First question: Technically, should the equation be written as 2! * (4/52) * (16/51) = 0.4827 (note the factorial)?

Secondly, is there a generic form that allows me to calculate the probability of drawing cards? For example, drawing three 5s? Three aces and a four?

Am I correct for three 5s to write (4/52)*(3/51)*(2/50)*3! and (4/52)*(3/51)*(2/50)*(4/49)*4! for the three aces and a four?

I'm trying to write an algorithm to gather probabilities of drawing cards. I was surprised at being able to solve a subset sum problem earlier yet these basic probability problems elude me. :-/

Thank you!
I would think of the first problem as drawing anyone of four (4 C 1), and anyone of a different 16 (16 C 1), compared with all the ways of drawing 2 from 52 (52 C 2). That gives 4*16*2/52*51 = approx .048. (You appear to have a factor of 10 error.)
But there are often many valid ways of approaching these problems.
(Simon, I think your way is not valid.)
For your more complicated example, (4 C 3)*(4 C 3)*(4 C 1)/(52 C 7). I leave you to check whether that's the same as you got.
 
(Simon, I think your way is not valid.)
So see if you can fault the reasoning ;)

I just constructed the probability tree ... here's the numbers:

(4/52)*(16/51)+(16/48)*(48/52)*(4/51) = 0.048265
 
Simon Bridge said:
So see if you can fault the reasoning ;)

I just constructed the probability tree ... here's the numbers:

(4/52)*(16/51)+(16/48)*(48/52)*(4/51) = 0.048265

OK, I misunderstood. You said denjay had miscounted, so I assumed you had arrived at a different number. Apart from the factor of 10 error, denjay's answer was correct.
 
Fair enough. denjay said: 2*(4/52)*(16/51) = 0.4827 with the "2*" in there because "the ten could have been drawn first"... i.e. two different ways of getting the result.

mine was (4/52)(16/51)+(4/51)(16/52)
as it happened ... this this is the same calculation but (possibly) arrived at by counting in a different way. I had not computed the number - so missed the factor of ten - I was commenting on the reasoning. It could have been that OP was aware of the difference though and had just missed out a step ;)
 
Probably said:
First question: Technically, should the equation be written as 2! * (4/52) * (16/51) ?
Yes, that is one way the write it, and you have arrived at the result in a way that is easy to generalize.
Secondly, is there a generic form that allows me to calculate the probability of drawing cards? For example, drawing three 5s? Three aces and a four?
Yes, for example the following will encompass all of your three examples:

Assume we have a deck of N cards, with ni of the cards labelled with the integer i, where i=1,2,3,...,a, and Ʃni=N. If we draw r cards at random, what is the probability of getting exactly ri labelled i, for i=1,2,...,a, and Ʃri=r?

If we simply count the number of desired possibilites, divided by all possibilities, we arrive at the following fomula involving binomial coefficients:

Probability = (n1 r1)(n2 r2)...(na ra)/(N r)
Am I correct for three 5s to write (4/52)*(3/51)*(2/50)*3! and (4/52)*(3/51)*(2/50)*(4/49)*4! for the three aces and a four?
In the first case you should not multiply with 3!, and in the second case you should multiply with 4 instead of 4!. The moral is to multiply with the number of different orderings of your cards, ignoring suits. In general, this is a multinomial coefficient. Your counting strategy, including a multinomial coefficient, can also be used in full generality to arrive at the formula given above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
6K