What is the Probability of Non-Overlapping Coins on a Rectangular Carpet?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_wiz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the probability of non-overlapping coins on a rectangular carpet, exploring theoretical approaches to calculate this probability given certain conditions, such as the dimensions of the carpet and the size of the coins. The conversation references related problems in probability theory, including Buffon's Needle Problem, and examines various methods for modeling the scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants recall that the problem of non-overlapping coins on a rectangular carpet is considered unsolved, with references to literature suggesting it remains an open question.
  • One participant draws a parallel to Buffon's Needle Problem, suggesting that similar probabilistic reasoning could apply to the coin problem.
  • A participant proposes a method to model the problem by replacing coins with crosses and calculating the probability of overlapping based on coordinates, indicating a potential approach to derive a solution.
  • Another participant suggests a different approach, focusing on the distances between the centers of coins and calculating the probability that these distances exceed twice the radius of the coins to avoid overlaps.
  • Concerns are raised about the need to account for all possible arrangements of coins on the carpet, highlighting the complexity introduced by varying sizes of the carpet and coins.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the solvability of the problem, with some suggesting potential methods for approaching it while others emphasize the challenges and unresolved aspects of the problem. No consensus is reached regarding a definitive solution or methodology.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions about the dimensions of the carpet and the sizes of the coins, as well as the need for a clear definition of the event space and conditions under which probabilities are calculated.

Physics_wiz
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
I remmeber reading before in a probability book that this is an unsolved problem (I don't know if it still is or not):

Given a rectangular carpet with dimensions m x n, find the probability that a coin with radius r will fall on the carpet without touching another coin that's already on the carpet (number of coins on the carpet would have to be known I guess).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It reminded me about the Buffon's Needle Problem: "Buffon's needle problem asks to find the probability that a needle of length l will land on a line, given a floor with equally spaced parallel lines a distance d apart. The problem was first posed by the French naturalist Buffon Eric Weisstein's World of Biography in 1733 (Buffon 1733, pp. 43-45), and reproduced with solution by Buffon in 1777 (Buffon 1777, pp. 100-104)." (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BuffonsNeedleProblem.html) .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I found the book where I read that problem. Here's what the problem is:

"We have a rectangular carpet and an indefinete supply of perfect pennies. What is the probability that if we drop the pennies on the carpet at random no two of them will overlap?"

The book says this one hasn't been solved yet, but gives the answer to the one dimensional problem: "Drop n needles of length h on a stick of length b at random. What's the probability that no two needles overlap?"

The answer is [(b-nh)/(b-h)]^n if b>=nh or 0 if b<nh

Any ideas about the first problem? I was thinking: if the one dimensional answer is given, then why not replace each penny by a cross and find the probability that the vertical line will have the same y coordinate as another vertical line then find the probability that the horizontal line will have the same x coordinate as another then multiply them together?
 
Physics_wiz said:
Any ideas about the first problem? I was thinking: if the one dimensional answer is given, then why not replace each penny by a cross and find the probability that the vertical line will have the same y coordinate as another vertical line then find the probability that the horizontal line will have the same x coordinate as another then multiply them together?

A different, simpler approach may be this:
- replace all coins with the center of the coin
- find the distance D_ij between all pairs of n points, so i:1 to n, j:1 to n, but j not equal to i
- what is the probability that all D_ij>2r (no overlaps)

It seems to me that this should be a solvable problem, if I integrate like the approach to Buffon's Needle.

Is there some feature I am missing that makes it unsolvable?
 
kfmfe04 said:
A different, simpler approach may be this:
- replace all coins with the center of the coin
- find the distance D_ij between all pairs of n points, so i:1 to n, j:1 to n, but j not equal to i
- what is the probability that all D_ij>2r (no overlaps)

It seems to me that this should be a solvable problem, if I integrate like the approach to Buffon's Needle.

Is there some feature I am missing that makes it unsolvable?

I don't know but I think at some point you need to calculate every possible arrangement of n coins on the surface available that satisfies your conditions. Of course, the problem doesn't specify how big the carpet is or how small the coins are. Therefore, choose a very small carpet and very big coins. (Actually you want to calculate the probability that coins will be in contact and subtract that from one. Also, the probability is always conditional on the state of the event space at time t(i)).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
10K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K