MHB What is the probability of two people meeting in a bar for exactly 15 minutes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ganesh Ujwal
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The probability of two people meeting in a bar for exactly 15 minutes, given uniform arrival times between 12:00 and 13:00, raises questions about the assumptions involved. A key point is that they must arrive within a specific timeframe, with arrival times restricted to between 12:00 and 12:45 to ensure a 15-minute overlap. The initial assumption of independent uniform arrival is crucial for a well-defined problem. A discussion on Math Stack Exchange provides a graphical solution and highlights the importance of formal modeling in probability calculations. Overall, the problem's formulation and assumptions significantly impact the probability outcome.
Ganesh Ujwal
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Two people have to spend exactly 15 consecutive minutes in a bar on a given day, between 12:00 and 13:00. Assuming uniform arrival times, what is the probability they will meet?I am mainly interested to see how people would model this formally. I came up with the answer 50% (wrong!) based on the assumptions that:- independent uniform arrival
- they will meet iff they actually overlap by some $$ ϵ>0$$
- we can measure time continuouslybut my methods felt a little ad hoc to me, and I would like to learn to make it more formal.Also I'm curious whether people think the problem is formulated unambiguously. I added the assumption of independent arrival myself for instance, because I think without such an assumption the problem is not well defined.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.