What is the probability of two people meeting in a bar for exactly 15 minutes?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ganesh Ujwal
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The probability of two people meeting in a bar for exactly 15 minutes, given uniform arrival times between 12:00 and 13:00, is a complex problem that requires formal modeling. The initial assumption of a 50% probability is incorrect. Key considerations include independent uniform arrival times and the necessity for overlapping time intervals of at least 15 minutes. A detailed graphical solution is provided in a related discussion on Math Stack Exchange, which emphasizes the importance of defining arrival time restrictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability theory and uniform distributions
  • Familiarity with time intervals and continuous measurement
  • Basic knowledge of graphical problem-solving techniques
  • Experience with mathematical modeling and assumptions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the graphical approach to probability problems, specifically in the context of meeting times
  • Explore the concept of independent uniform distributions in probability theory
  • Learn about time interval calculations and their implications in probability scenarios
  • Review discussions on Math Stack Exchange regarding similar probability problems for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and anyone interested in probability theory, particularly those exploring real-world applications of mathematical modeling in social scenarios.

Ganesh Ujwal
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Two people have to spend exactly 15 consecutive minutes in a bar on a given day, between 12:00 and 13:00. Assuming uniform arrival times, what is the probability they will meet?I am mainly interested to see how people would model this formally. I came up with the answer 50% (wrong!) based on the assumptions that:- independent uniform arrival
- they will meet iff they actually overlap by some $$ ϵ>0$$
- we can measure time continuouslybut my methods felt a little ad hoc to me, and I would like to learn to make it more formal.Also I'm curious whether people think the problem is formulated unambiguously. I added the assumption of independent arrival myself for instance, because I think without such an assumption the problem is not well defined.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K