MHB What is the probability of two people meeting in a bar for exactly 15 minutes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ganesh Ujwal
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The probability of two people meeting in a bar for exactly 15 minutes, given uniform arrival times between 12:00 and 13:00, raises questions about the assumptions involved. A key point is that they must arrive within a specific timeframe, with arrival times restricted to between 12:00 and 12:45 to ensure a 15-minute overlap. The initial assumption of independent uniform arrival is crucial for a well-defined problem. A discussion on Math Stack Exchange provides a graphical solution and highlights the importance of formal modeling in probability calculations. Overall, the problem's formulation and assumptions significantly impact the probability outcome.
Ganesh Ujwal
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Two people have to spend exactly 15 consecutive minutes in a bar on a given day, between 12:00 and 13:00. Assuming uniform arrival times, what is the probability they will meet?I am mainly interested to see how people would model this formally. I came up with the answer 50% (wrong!) based on the assumptions that:- independent uniform arrival
- they will meet iff they actually overlap by some $$ ϵ>0$$
- we can measure time continuouslybut my methods felt a little ad hoc to me, and I would like to learn to make it more formal.Also I'm curious whether people think the problem is formulated unambiguously. I added the assumption of independent arrival myself for instance, because I think without such an assumption the problem is not well defined.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K