What Is the Probability Robin Hood Wins Without Exposing His Identity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uasaki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the probability of Robin Hood winning a tournament by achieving at least four bullseyes with five arrows, while avoiding exposure of his identity if he hits all five bullseyes. The subject area includes probability theory and decision-making under constraints.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of assumptions regarding Robin's strategy for hitting bullseyes and whether he should purposefully miss shots. There are considerations of different scenarios where he might miss shots intentionally or accidentally.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various strategies and questioning the optimality of Robin's approach. Some guidance has been offered regarding maximizing his chances by delaying a deliberate miss until the last shot.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, such as the requirement to achieve at least four bullseyes and the implications of hitting all five. There is also mention of the complexity of proving the optimal strategy through advanced methods.

uasaki
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Although Robin Hood gets a bullseye with probability 0.9, he finds himself facing stiff competition in the tournament. To win he must get at least four bullseyes with his next five arrows. However, if he gets five bullseyes, he risks exposing his identity to the sheriff. Assume that if he wishes to, he can miss the bullseye with probability 1. What is the probability that Robin wins the tournament without risking exposing his identity?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



From the problem description, it seems like Robin is free to miss anyone of the next five shots. However, I assumed that he would try to hit the first four and purposefully miss the last (I'm not sure if this assumption is valid or if I need to consider other cases). The chance of Robin hitting the first four and missing the last one is exactly 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9. However, Robin could also accidentally miss one of the first four, which would force him to hit the rest. The probability that Robin misses a shot and hits the rest is 0.1 * 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9. There are exactly 4 ways that this situation could occur (i.e., Robin misses the first shot, Robin misses the second shot, etc), so the total probability would be 4 * 0.1 * 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9. Then, we can sum up the above two probabilities (they're disjoint since either Robin makes the first four or he doesn't).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That all looks right to me.
 
Thanks for the reply. Is there any reason why I don't need to consider the case(s) in which Robin tries to purposefully miss the first shot and make the rest, or purposefully miss the second shot and make the rest, etc?
 
uasaki said:
Thanks for the reply. Is there any reason why I don't need to consider the case(s) in which Robin tries to purposefully miss the first shot and make the rest, or purposefully miss the second shot and make the rest, etc?

He should not deliberately miss any of the first four; if he does so, he must make all his remaining shots in order to meet his goal. However, if he waits until his last shot (if needed) he maximizes his opportunity to make 4 out of 5 successfully. In other words, leaving a deliberate miss until the end gives him the greatest chance of making 4 out of 5.

RGV
 
That makes sense to me intuitively, but I'm not sure how I would go about proving that the strategy is optimal. Do I just need to compare the probability that Robin Hood will miss again if he intentionally misses one of the first four shots vs. the probability that Robin Hood will miss again if he accidentally misses one of the first four shots?
 
uasaki said:
That makes sense to me intuitively, but I'm not sure how I would go about proving that the strategy is optimal. Do I just need to compare the probability that Robin Hood will miss again if he intentionally misses one of the first four shots vs. the probability that Robin Hood will miss again if he accidentally misses one of the first four shots?

You can formulate the problem as a 5-stage Markov decision problem and derive an optimal policy from the dynamic programming functional equations. That proves optimality of the policy I stated---but that seems like "overkill", applying fancy tools to a simple situation.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K