MHB What is the probability that she selects none of those containing errors

rainbow1
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
A IRS auditor randomly selects 3 tax returns from 45 returns of which 15 contain errors. What is the probability that she selects none of those containing errors? Round to four decimal places.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is the probability that a randomly selected tax return contains errors? Does not contain errors?

Since the presence of errors in different returns is presumably independent, the probability of no errors in three reports is the product of the corresponding probabilities for each report.
 
Initially there are 45 returns. 15 of them contain errors. 45- 15= 30 do not contain errors. The probability the first selected does not contain errors is 30/45= 2/3. If the first selected contains errors, where are then 44 returns 29 of which contain errors. The probability the second return also does not contain errors is 29/44. If the second selected also does not contain errors then there are 43 returns 28 of which do not contain errors. The probability the third return does not contain errors is 28/43. The probability the three selected returns do not contain errors is (2/3)(29/44)(28/43).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top