What is the proof for Bertrand's theorem in celestial mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cristianbahena
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion provides a detailed proof of Bertrand's theorem in celestial mechanics, utilizing the Lagrangian formulation. The key equations include the conservation of angular momentum represented as ##L = \mu r^2 \dot{\varphi}## and the transformation of the potential energy into a function ##\tilde{V}(r) = \frac{L^2}{2\mu r^2} + V(r)##. The integral for the angle ##\varphi(r)## is derived using the substitution ##u=1/r##, leading to the expression for the angle difference ##\Theta## between the maximum and minimum radii. The proof concludes with the evaluation of energy at the minimum radius, establishing the relationship between the integral and the energy conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and the principle of least action.
  • Familiarity with angular momentum conservation in a central force field.
  • Knowledge of potential energy functions and their transformations.
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly integration techniques and substitutions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian for central force problems in classical mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of conservation laws in celestial mechanics.
  • Learn about different potential energy functions, particularly the forms used in orbital mechanics.
  • Investigate the applications of Bertrand's theorem in real-world celestial systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in classical mechanics, celestial mechanics, and mathematical physics. This discussion is also beneficial for researchers exploring orbital dynamics and energy conservation in gravitational systems.

cristianbahena
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I don't know how I can find the equation (2.78) and the next equations. It is from Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach: Jorge V.
Relevant Equations
integral equation of energy (central problem)
Screenshot at 2019-10-06 10-13-25.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually you will start from ##\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}\mu v^2 - V## and then write\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{2}\mu v^2 + V &= E \\

\frac{1}{2} \mu (\dot{r}^2 + r^2\dot{\varphi}^2) + V(r) &= E
\end{align*}Also ##\varphi## doesn't appear in the Lagrangian so ##\partial \mathcal{L} / \partial \dot{\varphi} = \mu r^2 \dot{\varphi} := L## is conserved, so you can replace ##\tilde{V}(r) := \frac{1}{2} \mu r^2 \dot{\varphi}^2 + V(r) = \dfrac{L^2}{2\mu r^2} + V(r)##. Further, write ##\dot{r} = \dfrac{dr}{d\varphi} \dot{\varphi} = \dfrac{dr}{d\varphi} \dfrac{L}{\mu r^2}## so that\begin{align*}
\frac{L^2}{2\mu^2 r^4} \left( \dfrac{dr}{d\varphi} \right)^2 + \tilde{V}(r) = E
\end{align*}which is simple to invert to the integral\begin{align*}

\varphi(r) = \sqrt{\frac{L^2}{2\mu}} \int^r \frac{dr}{r^2\sqrt{E - \tilde{V}(r)}}

\end{align*}The classic substitution is now ##u=1/r##, which transforms this into\begin{align*}

\tilde{\varphi}(u) = -\sqrt{\frac{L^2}{2\mu}} \int^{u} \frac{du}{\sqrt{E - \tilde{W}(u)}}

\end{align*}Of course we can also take the integral between the minimum and maximum ##u## of the orbit, and using the scaling ##u = yu_{\mathrm{max}}## given in the image the integral becomes\begin{align*}

\Theta := \varphi(r_{\mathrm{max}}) - \varphi(r_{\mathrm{min}}) = \sqrt{\frac{L^2}{2\mu}} \int_{v_{\mathrm{min}}}^1 \frac{u_{\mathrm{max}} dy}{\sqrt{E - \tilde{U}(y)}}

\end{align*}You should notice that since ##\tilde{V}(r) = \dfrac{L^2}{2\mu r^2} + V(r)##, that ##\tilde{W}(u) = \dfrac{L^2 u^2}{2\mu } + V\left(\dfrac{1}{u} \right)##. If we let ##V(r) = \alpha r^k## then ##\tilde{W}(u) = \dfrac{L^2 u^2}{2\mu } + \alpha u^{-k}##. Finally when we substitute for ##y## we see that\begin{align*}
\tilde{U}(y) = \dfrac{L^2 y^2 u_{\mathrm{max}}^2}{2\mu } + \alpha u_{\mathrm{max}}^{-k} y^{-k} = y^2 u_{\mathrm{max}}^2 \left( \dfrac{L^2 }{2\mu } + \alpha (yu_{\mathrm{max}})^{-(k+2)}\right) = u_{\mathrm{max}}^2 \mathcal{Y}(y)
\end{align*}Furthermore ##u_{\mathrm{max}}^2 \mathcal{Y}(1) = \dfrac{L^2 u_{\mathrm{max}}^2}{2\mu} + \alpha (u_{\mathrm{max}})^{-k} = E## is just the energy evaluated at the minimum radius, hence\begin{align*}
\Theta = \sqrt{\frac{L^2}{2\mu}} \int_{v_{\mathrm{min}}}^1 \frac{dy}{\sqrt{\mathcal{Y}(1) - \mathcal{Y}(y)}}
\end{align*}Although I can't comment on the line at the very end of the proof without seeing "equation (2.77)", hope it's somewhat helpful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and hutchphd

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
885
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K