What is the purpose of the electron neutrino?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter atxjoe512
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Neutrino
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the purpose and role of the electron neutrino in particle interactions, particularly in the context of decay processes such as beta decay. Participants explore the relationship between neutrinos and charged leptons, the conservation laws involved, and the implications of these interactions in particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the electron neutrino is not a product of electron decay but accompanies other decays, such as neutron decay, to conserve momentum and spin.
  • There is a proposal that electrons and electron neutrinos can be viewed as different quantum states of the same particle, with interactions converting between them.
  • One participant discusses historical context, mentioning that the introduction of neutrinos was motivated by the need to account for missing energy in beta decay, which could not be explained without positing an additional particle.
  • Lepton flavor conservation is highlighted, with participants explaining that the presence of an electron in decay necessitates the creation of an electron anti-neutrino to conserve lepton number and charge.
  • Some participants suggest that the neutrino can be conceptualized as going "backwards in time" in certain interactions, although this idea is met with skepticism and counterarguments regarding the directionality of time in particle interactions.
  • There is a discussion about the impossibility of creating an electron in isolation, emphasizing that it must be produced alongside its antiparticle or through decay processes involving neutrinos.
  • Participants elaborate on the mechanics of neutron decay, detailing the interactions involving W bosons and how they relate to the production of electrons and neutrinos.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the role and nature of the electron neutrino, with no consensus reached on certain conceptual interpretations, such as the time directionality of neutrinos or the implications of lepton flavor conservation. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly regarding the foundational understanding of these interactions.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations in the discussion include assumptions about the nature of "nothing but energy," the definitions of particles involved, and the complexities of decay processes that are not fully resolved. The mathematical descriptions provided are acknowledged as equivalent but may not encompass all nuances of the interactions discussed.

atxjoe512
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm still new to the world of physics... but I'm learning. I am reading a book that talks about the neutrino, and I understand the three neutrinos associated with the electron, muon, and tao particles.

If the purpose of the neutrino is to conserve energy and mass when a particle decays, why does the electron have a neutrino? Isn't the electron supposed to be so fundamental that it does not decay into something else?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An electron neutrino is not the product of electron decay. It accompanies an electron when something else decays, such as a neutron decaying into a proton and an electron. The neutrino is needed for conservation of momentum and spin.
 
Think of electrons and (electron) neutrinos as two different quantum (and mass) states of the same particle.

Where electrons (or other charged leptons) take part in weak (charged current) interactions, the latter always converts a charged lepton into the corresponding neutrino, or vice versa, or the equivalent with their antiparticles. The Feynman rules also allow (eg) an antineutrino to be given off in lieu of an incoming neutrino being absorbed - permutations such as these are mathematically equivalent.

For example the classic weak decay is

n → p^+ + e^- + \bar{\nu}​

where the outgoing anti-neutrino is equivalent to an incoming neutrino getting 'converted' into the electron.
 
If I'm not mistaken, back in the day people were looking at beta decay (like what Adrian the rock has posted), but it seemed like there was missing energy because nobody knew about neutrinos. The proton and electron didn't have enough, so it was either throw energy conservation in the bin, or postulate this very difficult-to-detect particle that could account for the missing energy.
Also there is something call lepton flavour conservation. You've got three flavours of charged lepton - the electron, the muon and the tauon. In any interaction, lepton number and lepton flavour must be conserved. So, looking at n \rightarrow p^{+} + e^{-} + \overline{\nu_{e}}, there were no leptons on the left hand side of the arrow, but there is an electron appearing on the right. That means the lepton number has increased by +1. If lepton flavour is to be conserved, there has to be an anti-lepton (which would have a corresponding lepton number of -1) of the same flavour produced at the same time. Also, to conserve electric charge, it must be neutral. So, there is an electron anti-neutrino required. It's not coming out of the electron, it's being created the same time as the electron.
 
Last edited:
Leptonic number was introduced later.
The problem was the conservation of energy and mommenta that made Pauli say "there exist another particle" and for the charge reasons, it had to be neutral...
 
Doofy said:
...Also there is something call lepton flavour conservation. You've got three flavours of charged lepton - the electron, the muon and the tauon. In any interaction, lepton number and lepton flavour must be conserved. So, looking at n \rightarrow p^{+} + e^{-} + \overline{\nu_{e}}, there were no leptons on the left hand side of the arrow, but there is an electron appearing on the right. That means the lepton number has increased by +1. If lepton flavour is to be conserved, there has to be an anti-lepton (which would have a corresponding lepton number of -1) of the same flavour produced at the same time. Also, to conserve electric charge, it must be neutral. So, there is an electron anti-neutrino required. It's not coming out of the electron, it's being created the same time as the electron.
It's a neutrino going backwards in time into the interaction, from whence it then comes out again, this time forward through time, as the electron!
 
welcome to pf!

hello atxjoe512! welcome to pf! :smile:
atxjoe512 said:
Isn't the electron supposed to be so fundamental that it does not decay into something else?

let's concentrate on creating an electron

we can't create an electron on its own!

either we create it out of "nothing but energy", and then we have to create its antiparticle also (the particle with opposite charge)

or we create it from neutron decay, and then we have to create its "weak partner" also (the particle with opposite isospin), ie the neutrino :wink:
 
It's a neutrino going backwards in time into the interaction, from whence it then comes out again, this time forward through time, as the electron!
Uh yeah, sure it is. :eek: How do you know it isn't the other way around?
 
Bill_K said:
Uh yeah, sure it is. :eek: How do you know it isn't the other way around?

If it is a β+ decay then it is! :)
 
  • #10
tiny-tim said:
...let's concentrate on creating an electron

we can't create an electron on its own!

either we create it out of "nothing but energy", and then we have to create its antiparticle also (the particle with opposite charge)
Apart possibly from "dark energy", there is no such thing as "nothing but energy". The so-called "pure energy" states sometimes mentioned when talking about annihilation or pair production are actually states of particles such as photos, gluons or weak bosons.
...or we create it from neutron decay, and then we have to create its "weak partner" also (the particle with opposite isospin), ie the neutrino :wink:
Actually, this is just a case of pair production.

At fundamental particle level, neutron decay is actually a two-part interaction:

d \rightarrow u + W^-;\ \ W^- \rightarrow e^- + \bar{\nu_e}​

But the Feynman diagram that describes the above also describes any of the following (amongst many others):

d \rightarrow u + W^-;\ \ W^- + e^+ \rightarrow \bar{\nu_e}​

e^+ \rightarrow \bar{\nu_e} + W^+;\ \ d + W^+ \rightarrow u​

e^+ + \nu_e \rightarrow W^+;\ \ d + W^+ \rightarrow u​
These examples are all positron capture reactions, so don't normally happen in practice, but all are theoretically possible. In the first, the incoming positron is converted into its corresponding anti-neutrino. The second is similar except that the W boson propagates in the opposite direction (so has to become W+ instead of W-). In the third the positron annihilates the neutrino to produce the W+.

All of these produce final states which have one more electron/one fewer positron, one fewer neutrino/one more anti-neutrino, one fewer down quark, and one more up quark, than their initial states. All are described by the same maths.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
21K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K