MHB What is the rate of change of angle in a 90 degree triangle?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rate of change of an angle in a 90-degree triangle using trigonometric relationships and derivatives. The initial calculations involve using the Pythagorean theorem and the cosine function to derive the angle's rate of change. The derived formula indicates that the angle decreases at a rate of approximately -0.055 m/s or -1/100 rad/s, with some uncertainty about the units used. Participants emphasize the importance of dimensional analysis to confirm that the angle's rate of change should be expressed in radians per second. Overall, the calculations and reasoning highlight the relationship between the triangle's dimensions and the angle's change over time.
ardentmed
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I need some more help for this problem set I've been working on. I'm doubting some of my answers and I'd appreciate some help.

This is only for question 1. Ignore 2.
Question:
08b1167bae0c33982682_19.jpg


For the first one, drawing out the question clearly tells us that we are working with a 90 degree triangle. Thus, we can calculate the angle via cosØ and the Pythagorean formula.

The derivative thereof is:

-sinØ dØ/dt = [dx/dt (s) - ds/dt (x)] / s^2

We can substitute for values and solve for ds/dt, which leads to:

ds/dt = 1.73205 m/s (is this supposed to be an exact value?


Thus, dØ/dt can be calculated via substitution of the newly calculated ds/dt value. From isolation, we get:

dØ/dt = -0.055 m/s (or decreasing at a rate of 0.055 m/s. I'm highly doubtful of my response to this question.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beginning with a sketch is a very good first step:

View attachment 2841

As we can see, we may write:

$$\cot(\theta)=\frac{x}{50}$$

Now, if we implicitly differentiate with respect to time $t$, we get:

$$-\csc^2(\theta)\d{\theta}{t}=\frac{1}{50}\d{x}{t}$$

Now, since:

$$\csc(\theta)=\frac{L}{50}$$

we may write:

$$\d{\theta}{t}=-\frac{50}{L^2}\d{x}{t}$$

Now, what do you get when you plug in the given values for $$L,\,\d{x}{t}$$?
 

Attachments

  • kite.png
    kite.png
    958 bytes · Views: 106
MarkFL said:
Beginning with a sketch is a very good first step:

View attachment 2841

As we can see, we may write:

$$\cot(\theta)=\frac{x}{50}$$

Now, if we implicitly differentiate with respect to time $t$, we get:

$$-\csc^2(\theta)\d{\theta}{t}=\frac{1}{50}\d{x}{t}$$

Now, since:

$$\csc(\theta)=\frac{L}{50}$$

we may write:

$$\d{\theta}{t}=-\frac{50}{L^2}\d{x}{t}$$

Now, what do you get when you plug in the given values for $$L,\,\d{x}{t}$$?

Plugging in the aforementioned values results in the following expression:

$\d{\theta}{t}$ = (-50*2)/(100^2)
$\d{\theta}{t}$ = -1/100 rad/minute (albeit I'm doubting the units for the final answer. Is it m/s, since the other units were also m/s? I just assumed rad/minute due to commonly seeing it used in related rates questions with angles.)

Thanks again.
 
Yes, the angle is decreasing at a rate of 1/100 rad/s at that point in time. If you look at the right side of:

$$\d{\theta}{t}=-\frac{50}{L^2}\d{x}{t}$$

Performing a dimensional analysis, we see the units are:

$$\frac{\text{m}}{\text{m}^2}\cdot\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}=\frac{1}{\text{s}}$$

Because we measure angles in radians, and being the ratio of two lengths, are dimensionless, so we take the rate of change here to be radians per second.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K