What is the recommended background for PChem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blaughli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pchem
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the recommended background for taking physical chemistry (PChem), including the necessary prerequisites in quantum mechanics, electricity and magnetism, and the overall difficulty of the course. Participants share their experiences and advice regarding the course structure, including the potential time commitment and the presence of a laboratory component.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether to take PChem now or wait for a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics and electricity and magnetism, noting their current coursework in calculus and chemistry.
  • Some participants suggest that the background mentioned is sufficient to take PChem, indicating that it is aimed at aspiring chemists and should be manageable with a sophomore-level background.
  • There is a discussion about the general structure of PChem, which typically includes thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, chemical kinetics, and possibly computational chemistry.
  • Concerns are raised about the time-intensive nature of the course, particularly regarding the laboratory component, with some participants noting that the lab work can be more demanding than expected.
  • One participant questions whether it is common to offer PChem without a lab, expressing uncertainty about the learning experience without hands-on work.
  • Another participant mentions that at their school, the lab is optional, while at other institutions it may be required, suggesting that taking the lab could enhance the learning experience.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a sophomore-level background in physics and chemistry is adequate for taking PChem. However, there is disagreement regarding the perceived difficulty of the course and the necessity of a laboratory component, with varying opinions on whether the lab is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the material.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the variability in course structure and requirements across different institutions, particularly regarding the laboratory component, which may affect the overall time commitment and learning outcomes.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering taking physical chemistry, particularly those with a background in chemistry and physics, as well as those interested in understanding the course's demands and structure.

blaughli
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
I want to take PChem, but I'm wondering if I should wait until I have a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics and electricity and magnetism. I've seen QM in a modern physics class and I've taken a sophomore level E&M class. I've got my calculus down pretty well, and I've taken two semesters of gen chem and two of Ochem.

Any advice on recommended background would be appreciated. I'm looking to get as much out of the class as possible (and to also not struggle the whole way through), so I'm not opposed to waiting a few semesters. I do have an opening in my upcoming schedule, however, so I thought that I should do it if I'm ready.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
that background is good. go for it.
 
That sounds fine.

Remember, p.chem. (in general) is aimed at all aspiring chemists, not just those who harbor the notion of becoming a p. chemist/theoretician later on in life. It will (hopefully) be taught at an appropriately challenging level to set you up well for further classes (and, ideally, serve as a nice complement for those who are doing additional courses/study in physics). The other thing to keep in mind is that while the general breakdown in p.chem. is "a semester of thermo and a semester of quantum," you also will (typically) get additional exposure to chemical kinetics, some spectroscopic methods, a dash of computational chemistry, and some surfaces/solid state chemistry.
 
Thanks for the advice. I've heard that PChem can be pretty time-intensive, so I'm still on the fence, but it's good to know that it should be manageable with a sophomore level physics and chemistry background.

I wonder, is it generally considered a pretty tough chemistry class? I'm deciding between two math or one math and one pchem class next semester
 
blaughli said:
Thanks for the advice. I've heard that PChem can be pretty time-intensive, so I'm still on the fence, but it's good to know that it should be manageable with a sophomore level physics and chemistry background.

I wonder, is it generally considered a pretty tough chemistry class? I'm deciding between two math or one math and one pchem class next semester
It's a pretty tough chemistry course for most chemistry majors who avoid math and physics.

It's really not that hard.
 
Jorriss said:
It's a pretty tough chemistry course for most chemistry majors who avoid math and physics.

It's really not that hard.

Concur. Having said that, the one thing that might make it fairly time-intensive is the nature of the laboratory component. This is less a statement about the difficulty of the material and more about the nature of doing reasonably acceptable laboratory work.

While I learned a great deal in p.chem. lab, it definitely took up more time than its ostensible credit hours would suggest...
 
Thanks for the words of wisdom. I'm definitely not put-off by the idea of using math and physics in chemistry.

Honestly, I'm not sure at this point if there is a lab for this class or not. It is the "higher-level" pchem, and the schedule does not seem to mention a lab. Is it unheard of to offer pchem without a lab?

It would probably require a lot less time and effort to take this class without the burden of doing detailed reports. Then again, perhaps I would learn a lot less without hands-on experience. Any thoughts on that?
 
blaughli said:
Thanks for the words of wisdom. I'm definitely not put-off by the idea of using math and physics in chemistry.

Honestly, I'm not sure at this point if there is a lab for this class or not. It is the "higher-level" pchem, and the schedule does not seem to mention a lab. Is it unheard of to offer pchem without a lab?

It would probably require a lot less time and effort to take this class without the burden of doing detailed reports. Then again, perhaps I would learn a lot less without hands-on experience. Any thoughts on that?

At my school there's an optional lab. At other schools the lab is required. If you want to learn more, take the lab. It is worth your while and a hell of a lot more useful than labs like inorganic synthesis. You might actually use the knowledge in that lab on the job, as opposed to the synthesis labs which you'll probably never use again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K