What is the relationship between crossing over and linked genes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iScience
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between crossing over and linked genes, specifically addressing the statistical outcomes of offspring genotypes in relation to parental genotypes. It highlights that the parent genotype often appears most frequently, suggesting limited crossing over during meiosis. The conversation also clarifies the concepts of complete linkage, defined as a zero probability of crossover, and partial linkage, emphasizing the randomness of crossing over events. The insights reference Sturtevant's proportionality theory regarding gene distance and recombination frequency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of meiosis and prophase I
  • Familiarity with genetic linkage and recombination
  • Knowledge of Sturtevant's linkage maps
  • Basic concepts of complete and partial linkage
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of crossing over during meiosis
  • Study the implications of gene distance on recombination frequency
  • Explore advanced genetic linkage mapping techniques
  • Investigate the statistical analysis of offspring genotypes in genetic studies
USEFUL FOR

Genetics students, researchers in molecular biology, educators teaching genetics, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of gene linkage and recombination.

iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
in a table with a in all of the table with the genotypes I'm being presented with (for linkages), like this one..

http://i.imgur.com/MQ7p2bI.jpg

the parent genotype (original genotype) is always statistically the highest. i don't understand, i thought crossing over always happened in prophase I, this data would suggest otherwise wouldn't it? if the offspring statistics match that of the parent's genotype, then it's not likely that crossing over happens many many times and then eventually comes back to to the original; it's more likely that the offspring genotypes just haven't changed at all which would imply no crossing over, but why? again, i thought all chromosomes underwent crossing over in Prophase I.

and what makes the middle gene so probablistically low when it is the only one from another chromosome? the fact that it had to undergo crossing over twice? why is this so unlikely?

also, what is the difference between complete linkage and partial linkage?

http://i.imgur.com/6lqfhlG.png

my understanding is that complete linkage is when there is a zero probability of a cross over. how can this ever be true if two genes are on one chromosome? even if the two genes are right next to each other, how can this be true?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Crossing over is a random event. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21827/ (Linkage maps)

"The basic idea here is quite simple. Imagine two specific genes positioned a certain fixed distance apart. Now imagine random crossing-over along the paired homologs. In some meiotic divisions, nonsister chromatids cross over by chance in the chromosomal region between these genes; from these meioses, recombinants are produced. In other meiotic divisions, there are no crossovers between these genes; no recombinants result from these meioses. Sturtevant postulated a rough proportionality: the greater the distance between the linked genes, the greater the chance that nonsister chromatids would cross over in the region between the genes and, hence, the greater the proportion of recombinants that would be produced."
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
6K