What is the Relationship Between Energy and Time in Different Frames?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chewwy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Frames
chewwy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
something which seems so fundamental that i can't find anywhere that derives it is the following:

E' = gamma * (E - p.v)

where E is the energy in one frame, p the momentum, v the relative velocity of the other frame, and E' the energy in the other frame.

i.e. energy transforms like time. i can't quite see where this comes from though.. help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It comes from the fact that energy is the "zeroth" component of the momentum four-vector (p_0, p_1, p_2, p_3) = (E/c, p_x, p_y, p_z), just like time is the "zeroth" component of the position four-vector (x_0, x_1, x_2, x_3) = (ct, x, y, z).
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi chewwy! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a gamma: γ :wink:)
chewwy said:
energy transforms like time. i can't quite see where this comes from though.. help?

Yes, it's because (E,p) is defined as the derivative of (t,x),

so E' = γE - γ(p.v),

just as t' = γt - γ(x.v)
 
jtbell said:
It comes from the fact that energy is the "zeroth" component of the momentum four-vector (p_0, p_1, p_2, p_3) = (E/c, p_x, p_y, p_z), just like time is the "zeroth" component of the position four-vector (x_0, x_1, x_2, x_3) = (ct, x, y, z).

okie doke. thanks everyone!
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top