What is the relationship between intensity and amplitude in waves?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The intensity of a wave is directly proportional to the square of its amplitude, as established in wave theory. When multiple identical wave sources are combined, their amplitudes add up, resulting in a collective amplitude that can significantly increase intensity, provided the sources are in phase. For example, five identical sources with amplitude A0 yield a collective amplitude of 5A, leading to an intensity increase by a factor of 25. This relationship is further illustrated through electrical power equations, where power is proportional to the square of voltage, reinforcing the concept that amplitude and intensity are intrinsically linked.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and amplitude
  • Familiarity with the concept of intensity in physics
  • Basic knowledge of electrical power equations (P = V^2/R)
  • Concept of phase relationships in wave interference
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of intensity as a function of amplitude in wave mechanics
  • Explore the principles of constructive and destructive interference in wave theory
  • Study the relationship between voltage, current, and power in electrical circuits
  • Investigate real-world applications of wave intensity in acoustics and optics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental relationships between wave properties and energy transfer.

Gauss M.D.
Messages
151
Reaction score
1
This is something I don't relly get. I keep reading that the intensity of a wave is proportional to the square of its amplitude.

So let's suppose we have a random wave source, with amplitude A0. If we replace that source with five identical copies of it, their collective amplitude is 5A, yes? But have I really raised the energy level at the source by a factor of 25? What am I missing here?

(X-posting since I think the subforum I posted in was not appropriate)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lets look at an electrical example. Power = (voltage)^2/R. In general power is equivalent to intensity while voltage is equivalent of amplitude. If you double the voltage, the power goes up by four. If voltage goes up by 5, power goes up by 25.
 
i'll use the electrical example slightly differently …

the energy (or power) is proportional to VI (voltage times current) …

how are you going to double the current without doubling the voltage? :wink:
 
Gauss M.D. said:
This is something I don't relly get. I keep reading that the intensity of a wave is proportional to the square of its amplitude.

So let's suppose we have a random wave source, with amplitude A0. If we replace that source with five identical copies of it, their collective amplitude is 5A, yes? But have I really raised the energy level at the source by a factor of 25? What am I missing here?

(X-posting since I think the subforum I posted in was not appropriate)

If they are really copies of each other, the amplitudes will add and the intensity is indeed 25x.

But they must be in phase with each other.
 
Gauss M.D. said:
I keep reading that the intensity of a wave is proportional to the square of its amplitude.

So let's suppose we have a random wave source, with amplitude A0. If we replace that source with five identical copies of it, their collective amplitude is 5A, yes? But have I really raised the energy level at the source by a factor of 25? What am I missing here?
Consider two sources like sin(t). (Sound waves, say, except that I'll ignore attenuation with distance.) Suppose they are not co-located, so in places they will interfere constructively and in other places destructively. In general, they may be received as sin(t+α) and sin(t-α). That adds to 2 sin(t)cos(α). Squaring and integrating 0 to 2π gives 4π cos2(α). If we suppose all phase differences (α values) occur equally across a region, we can integrate wrt α and obtain an average value of 2π. A single sin(t) source gives π, so the power from two sources is double, as expected.
If the sources are exactly co-located then indeed you will get four times the power everywhere, but in this case the source is working four times as hard.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
990
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K