What is the relationship between standing waves, tension, and velocity?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 2K views
zell_D
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
upload.jpg

Homework Statement


see question 2a, b

Homework Equations


a) v=f(wavelength)
b) v= sqrt(F/(m/L))

The Attempt at a Solution


a) f=2.5 Hz, t=1.0 s and one wavelength on the graph is I guess 0.4 m?
v=2.5(.4)=1 m/s
b) f=5.0 Hz, tension same
v= sqrt(F/(m/L)) means that a change in frequency will not change the velocity?
1=5(wavelength)
wavelength= 0.2 m?


Homework Statement


see question 3a, b

Homework Equations


fn=(n/2L)(sqrt(F/(m/L))

The Attempt at a Solution


a)since this is a second harmonic, f2 = 2(2/L)(sqrt(F/(m/L)) = (1/L)(sqrt(F/(m/L))... wavelength = L

quadrupling F would mean that f=(1/L)(sqrt(4F/(m/L)) = (2/L)(sqrt(F/(m/L))
since f does not change, only way that these two will be equal is if the above is divided by 2
(2/2L)(sqrt(F/(m/L)) = (1/L)(sqrt(F/(m/L))
thus wavelength = 2L, so the new picture should just contain half of the wave?

b)tripling tension would mean that wavelength = sqrt(3)L... this shouldn't be possible right? since a standing wave needs to be connected at both ends (nodes) and having a wavelength of 1.7L would not connect on one end...please help! thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should start off by looking at the first calculation. You've picked up an extra factor of 10 somewhere.
 
edited, but do things seem right or are they wrong 2b and 3a, b are the ones I am not sure on