What is the relationship between work and potential energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationship between work and potential energy is defined by the equation ΔU = W, where ΔU represents the change in potential energy and W is the work done. In gravitational contexts, the work done to lift an object is expressed as W = U2 - U1, indicating that the work done by an external agent, such as a rocket booster, is necessary to overcome gravitational forces. The gravitational potential energy is negative, reflecting the energy required to move an object away from the Earth. Both hand lifting and rocket propulsion involve work done against gravity, but the formulas used depend on the context of the energy transfer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly work and energy
  • Familiarity with gravitational potential energy equations
  • Knowledge of forces acting on objects in motion
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of gravitational potential energy in detail, focusing on the equation U = -G(m1m2)/r
  • Learn about the work-energy theorem and its applications in different scenarios
  • Explore the differences between conservative and non-conservative forces in physics
  • Investigate real-world applications of work and energy in rocket propulsion systems
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics courses, educators teaching energy concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in gravitational contexts.

soljaragz
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi, I haven't taken physics yet, but I am reading a Sparknotes Physics book for fun, and there's something that i don't understand

In one part of the book, when it was talking about basic energy stuff it said that - ΔU = W

http://www.sparknotes.com/physics/workenergypower/conservationofenergy/terms.html

but then a few chapters later it shows a problem with potential gravitational energy, and

it said "W= U2 - U1" ... what happened to the negative sign?


(no source, since the website on this chapter is not current)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably the later reference has some outside agent (a person?)
doing Work against the gravitational Force.
If the motion is always slow, then the person's Force is opposite gravity's
(that is, F by person = NEGATIVE F by gravity).

So that Energy is *transferred* as the Force application point is moved.
 
Last edited:
Hmm...im not sure

but here is the actual problem

A satellite of mass m is launched from the surface of the Earth into an orbit of radius 2r, where r is the radius of the Earth. How much work is done to get it into orbit?
 
W = U2-U1 = -G(m1m2)/2r - -Gm1m2/r

in the book it said potential grav. energy is -G(m1m2)/r where r is displacement and m1 is object mass, m2 is Earth mass
 
It takes an "outside agent" (a rocket booster!) that does Work
to get the satellite into orbit ...
gravity's Force removes Energy from the satellite as the satellite rises.

By the way, Grav.P.E. is negative, which reminds us that we are trapped
down here ... we need to add Energy to something just to get it far away,
and additional Energy to make it go fast there.
 
hmmm..ok i sort of get it
 
I guess I should have said (in post #2) that

The Work done by gravity's Force = - Delta U = - Ufinal - Uinitial .

To lift something, your Force apllied to that thing
is (approx) the negative of gravity's Force applied to it.
 
you mean -DeltaU = -(Ufinal - U).

but what is the difference between a hand picking up an object against gravity, and a rocketbooster boosting a rocket against gravity?
shouldn't they be using the same formula?
but what I am seeing is the first problem uses W=-DeltaU and the latter uses W=DeltaU...

ugh, I can't wait to take physics next year
 
In both cases the work done by the outside force--hand or rocket--will equal the change in total mechanical energy (PE + KE).
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K