MHB What is the remainder when m+n is divided by 1000 in a trigonometric challenge?

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $x$ be a real number such that $\dfrac{\sin^4 x}{20}+\dfrac{\cos^4 x}{21}=\dfrac{1}{41}$. If the value of $\dfrac{\sin^6 x}{20^3}+\dfrac{\cos^6 x}{21^3}$ can be expressed as $\dfrac{m}{n}$ where $m$ and $n$ are relatively prime positive integers, find the remainder when $m+n$ is divided by 1000.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If $\dfrac{\sin^4x}{20} + \dfrac{\cos^4x}{21} = \dfrac1{41}$ then $$21*41\sin^4x + 20*41(1 - \sin^2x)^2 = 20*21,$$ $$41^2\sin^4x - 2*20*41\sin^2x + 20^2 = 0,$$ $$(41\sin^2x - 20)^2 = 0.$$ Therefore $\sin^2x = \dfrac{20}{41}$, $\cos^2x = \dfrac{21}{41}$ and $$\dfrac{\sin^6x}{20^3} + \dfrac{\cos^6x}{21^3} = \dfrac1{41^3} + \dfrac1{41^3} = \dfrac2{68921}.$$ So $m = 2$, $n = 68921$, $m+n = 68923$ and the remainder when $m+n$ is divided by $1000$ is $923$.
 
Aww, very well done, Opalg! I have been trying to solve it for a number of times and for some reason, I didn't see the way to tackle it as you did! As always, thanks for your insightful solution!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top