What Is the Resistance of a Toroidal Conductor Segment?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the resistance of a segment of a toroidal resistor, specifically focusing on the resistance between the flat ends with a circular cross-section. The problem involves concepts from electrostatics and circuit theory, including Laplace's equation and Ohm's Law.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the problem, including the geometry of the toroidal segment and the application of Laplace's equation. There are attempts to relate potential difference and current using Ohm's Law. Some participants express confusion regarding the interpretation of variables and the complexity of integrals involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to approach the problem. Some have provided insights into the geometry and setup, while others are questioning assumptions and clarifying definitions. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive lines of reasoning are being developed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion arising from the notation used in the problem statement, particularly regarding the variable φ representing both potential and angle. There are also mentions of missing information from the provided figures, which may impact the understanding of the problem setup.

runnergirl
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a segment of a toroidal (doughnut-shaped) resistor with a horizontal cross-section (see attachment for the figure). Show that the resistance between the flat ends having a circular cross-section is given by
R = [itex]\frac{\phi_o}{σπ(√b-√a)^2}[/itex]


Homework Equations


Laplace's equation: [itex]\nabla^2\phi = 0[/itex].
E-field in terms of the potential: E=[itex]-\nabla\phi[/itex]
(both for cylindrical coordinates)
I = ∫[itex]J\cdot dA[/itex]
J = σE
R = [itex]\frac{\phi}{I}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


From Laplace's equation we know that the potential will only vary with the angle

[itex]\phi[/itex] and it will vary linearly : [itex]\phi = k_1\phi+k_2[/itex]

due to BC [itex]\phi(0) = 0 = k_2[/itex] and [itex]\phi(\phi_o) = k_1\phi_o = V_o[/itex]

the E-field is [itex]\frac{-k_1}{r}\phi-direction[/itex]

Using the equation for the current: I = ∫[itex]-σk_1∫\frac{1}{r}drdz[/itex] where the dz portion is the height of the strip and the integrand goes from a to b (the change of radius).

Where I'm having issue is setting up the height of the strip. If you look at the attached picture I've drawn out what I think should be the height, but the integral gets pretty complex and I get some complex numbers when I apply the limits. If someone would please show me my mistake, I would be most grateful.
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 786
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you got a figure describing the problem? I can't figure out where the connection to the resistor are made. If I cut the toroid at a c ross-section & stretched it out, would the connections be to the two freed ends? Can't be that simple I guess ...
PLUS - the problem's answer makes no sense. How can resistance be proportional to potential? Are you sure you copied the problem correctly?
 
The figure is that pie shaped figure in the beginning that I drew on the attachment. That zoomed in circle is also similar to what they show as well with the dr strip and radius, r.

Using Ohm's Law is how you relate the potential difference between the flat ends and the current flowing through the wedge. So [itex]\phi = IR[/itex] and solve for R.

I included the question word for word out of the book. And on the attachment I included both figures that would given with the problem.

Thanks for helping again.
 
runnergirl said:

Homework Statement


Consider a segment of a toroidal (doughnut-shaped) resistor with a horizontal cross-section (see attachment for the figure). Show that the resistance between the flat ends having a circular cross-section is given by
R = [itex]\frac{\phi_o}{σπ(√b-√a)^2}[/itex]


Homework Equations


Laplace's equation: [itex]\nabla^2\phi = 0[/itex].
E-field in terms of the potential: E=[itex]-\nabla\phi[/itex]
(both for cylindrical coordinates)
I = ∫[itex]J\cdot dA[/itex]
J = σE
R = [itex]\frac{\phi}{I}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


From Laplace's equation we know that the potential will only vary with the angle

[itex]\phi[/itex] and it will vary linearly : [itex]\phi = k_1\phi+k_2[/itex]

due to BC [itex]\phi(0) = 0 = k_2[/itex] and [itex]\phi(\phi_o) = k_1\phi_o = V_o[/itex]

the E-field is [itex]\frac{-k_1}{r}\phi-direction[/itex]

Using the equation for the current: I = ∫[itex]-σk_1∫\frac{1}{r}drdz[/itex] where the dz portion is the height of the strip and the integrand goes from a to b (the change of radius).

Where I'm having issue is setting up the height of the strip. If you look at the attached picture I've drawn out what I think should be the height, but the integral gets pretty complex and I get some complex numbers when I apply the limits. If someone would please show me my mistake, I would be most grateful.

OK, I think I finally figured out what [itex]\phi_o[/itex] is. I got confused since they use
φ for both potential and angle. So [itex]\phi_o[/itex] apparently represents the section of toroid cut out from a whole toroid (in other words, if it were a whole toroid, [itex]\phi_o[/itex] would = 2π. Right or wrong, I will proceed on that assumption.

This would then be, as you say, somewhat similar to our old nemesis, the mag toroid, but much simpler math-wise. From your illustration (BTW some of it's missing in your scan) it looks like you set up your origin at the center of the toroid again, so we'll go with that. The equation for the cross-section circle of radius R is then

(r-r0)^2 + y^2 = R^2 where R = (b-a)/2 and r0 = (b+a)/2.

I would take a differential cross-sectional slice dy just like you did. The conductance of this cross-section, extended over the toroid angle [itex]\phi_o[/itex] is

dG = (σ/[itex]\phi_o[/itex]r)(2√(a^2 - y^2)dr
but y^2 = R^2 - (r-r0)^2
so dG = (σ/[itex]\phi_o[/itex]r)(2√{a^2 - [R^2 - (r-r0)^2]}dr

where conductance = 1/resistance.

Then, just integrate G = ∫dG from r=a to r=b and finally R = 1/G.

In other words, I would not work with Laplace's equation at all. In fact, I'm not sure how to go about it that way.
 
So attached is my solution. I am off by a minus sign, but overall everything else works out nicely. The integral again isn't all that pretty but does simplify nicely. And if anyone does find the negative sign mess up (should be with applying the arcsin or somewhere in there) please let me know.
 

Attachments

  • page1.jpg
    page1.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 687
  • page2.jpg
    page2.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 770
  • page3.jpg
    page3.jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 722

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K