What is the result of this double integral?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 3K views
arroy_0205
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
Consider the double integral
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx f(x) \, \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy g(y) [/tex]
The first one gives 0 the second one gives infinity (diverges). Then how to express the result of the integral? Is it 0 or infinity or neither (indeterminate)? Any other comments about the integration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you wrote isn't so much a double integral as it is a product of two integrals. What rule from basic calculus can be used to resolve things that tend to [itex]0\cdot\infty[/itex] as some parameter tends to zero or infinity?
 
It was really wrong to call that a double integral.

L'Hospital rule come to my mind as the answer to your question but that is applicable in calculating limit problems. This is case different. I do not know of any method applicable here.

Also there is no "single parameter" in the problem which gives rise to [tex]0\cdot\infty[/tex] form.
 
Last edited:
arroy_0205 said:
L'Hospital rule come to my mind as the answer to your question but that is applicable in calculating limit problems. This is case different. I do not know of any method applicable here.
The improper definite integral
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\,dx[/tex]
is shorthand for
[tex]\lim_{L\to\infty}\int_{-L}^{L}f(x)\,dx[/tex]
So, how is this case any different?
 
D H said:
The improper definite integral
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\,dx[/tex]
is shorthand for
[tex]\lim_{L\to\infty}\int_{-L}^{L}f(x)\,dx[/tex]
So, how is this case any different?
NO! that is the "Cauchy Principal Value". The correct definition is
[tex]\lim_{A\to\infty}\lim_{B\to\infty}\int_{B}^{A}f(x)\,dx[/tex]