What is the role of funding in the field of astrophysics?

  • Context: Physics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bear-bear
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of funding in astrophysics, particularly in relation to career paths, educational requirements, and the daily activities of astrophysicists. Participants explore the implications of social skills, job availability, and personal motivations for pursuing a career in astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants emphasize the importance of social skills in research fields, suggesting that collaboration and communication are crucial for success in astrophysics.
  • Others discuss the educational pathway to becoming an astrophysicist, highlighting the need for a physics major, advanced studies, and post-doctoral experience.
  • There are differing views on the motivations for pursuing astrophysics, with some questioning whether personal interests align with the realities of the field.
  • One participant shares their experience in theoretical astrophysics, noting the necessity of securing funding while working on research projects.
  • Concerns are raised about job availability in astrophysics, with some participants suggesting that the field may not offer sufficient opportunities post-PhD.
  • Several participants express a passion for space and the artistic aspects of astrophysics, while others caution against romanticizing the profession based on popular imagery.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the motivations for pursuing astrophysics or the job market's viability. There are competing views on the necessity of social skills and the realities of working in the field.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reflect uncertainty about the specific roles and responsibilities of astrophysicists, as well as the impact of funding on research opportunities. The conversation also reveals a lack of clarity regarding the educational requirements and career prospects in astrophysics.

Who May Find This Useful

High school students considering a career in astrophysics, individuals interested in the educational pathways to becoming an astrophysicist, and those curious about the realities of working in the field.

  • #31
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
You could be a telescope salesman!

I had a Summer job working in theoretical astrophysics. What I did was programming. I typed in physics equations to calculate how many atoms of specific kinds there were at certain altitudes within the Sun. And compared the results with observations made by another team (experimentalists). The general goal here was to make the model and the observations fit together, and tweak either as needed. It was a long term project of which I was only a small part. Much of the job when full time is to keep funding coming while you keep tweaking the models and the observations. So programming can be a big part of it, as well as designing instruments for specific purposes.

BTW, modern astrophysicists don't spend their time eyeballing telescopes. Cameras do that. The people then process the data or images and interpret the results, matching them with theory and combining with other independent observations.

Hey.
I think the part in bold was glossed over by everyone. Everything else: working with computers, optical instruments, colleagues, etc. are things you'd probably get enough practice at in school. What about the "keeping funding coming" part. Could someone elaborate on that? Is that like asking for grants? How tough/competitive is that?

Thnx, and happy holidays everyone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Nspyred said:
What about the "keeping funding coming" part. Could someone elaborate on that? Is that like asking for grants? How tough/competitive is that?

For junior faculty, it mainly involves writing grant proposals, which is a non-trivial exercise. For more senior scientists it means going up to Washington D.C. and doing hard core lobbying for more money on certain projects. For some projects, like telescopes, it's a matter of making friends with people with money and convincing them to give.

How tough it is depends on the season. Right now, everyone is cutting so it's a pain to get money for anything.
 
  • #33
Nspyred said:
...What about the "keeping funding coming" part. Could someone elaborate on that? Is that like asking for grants? How tough/competitive is that?

An example may be to get the funds needed to build a new telescope. If for some reason, they aren't available, it should be possible to find a lab that has similar equipment, in which case the equipment can be rented as needed. In all cases, one has to be imaginative enough to make the best of what is available. When enough researchers believe that non-existing equipment has to be built, they come together, and things get done.

Time spent on grant proposal by faculty members can easily take up 10-40% of their time. Naturally, a mature faculty member having many graduate students may put more care into this. The students do the actual research, while the professor can possibly spend his entire "research" time in his office (i.e. never in the lab) seeking funding, being there for his students only to answer questions and give out guide lines as needed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
21K