What is the role of funding in the field of astrophysics?

  • Context: Physics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bear-bear
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the pathway to becoming an astrophysicist, emphasizing the importance of a strong foundation in physics, astronomy, and mathematics. Participants highlight that a typical career trajectory includes obtaining a bachelor's degree in physics or astronomy, followed by a doctorate, and often a post-doctoral position. Social skills are crucial for collaboration and networking in research environments, countering the misconception that astrophysics is a solitary field. The conversation also addresses the realities of job availability and the necessity of programming skills in modern astrophysics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of physics and astronomy fundamentals
  • Familiarity with advanced mathematics
  • Knowledge of programming languages for data analysis
  • Awareness of academic and research career pathways
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the University of Toronto's Astronomy and Physics Specialist program
  • Learn about the role of programming in astrophysics research
  • Explore post-doctoral opportunities in astrophysics
  • Investigate the job market for astrophysicists in both academia and industry
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for high school students considering a career in astrophysics, undergraduate students pursuing physics or astronomy, and anyone interested in the practical aspects of astrophysics research and career prospects.

  • #31
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
You could be a telescope salesman!

I had a Summer job working in theoretical astrophysics. What I did was programming. I typed in physics equations to calculate how many atoms of specific kinds there were at certain altitudes within the Sun. And compared the results with observations made by another team (experimentalists). The general goal here was to make the model and the observations fit together, and tweak either as needed. It was a long term project of which I was only a small part. Much of the job when full time is to keep funding coming while you keep tweaking the models and the observations. So programming can be a big part of it, as well as designing instruments for specific purposes.

BTW, modern astrophysicists don't spend their time eyeballing telescopes. Cameras do that. The people then process the data or images and interpret the results, matching them with theory and combining with other independent observations.

Hey.
I think the part in bold was glossed over by everyone. Everything else: working with computers, optical instruments, colleagues, etc. are things you'd probably get enough practice at in school. What about the "keeping funding coming" part. Could someone elaborate on that? Is that like asking for grants? How tough/competitive is that?

Thnx, and happy holidays everyone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Nspyred said:
What about the "keeping funding coming" part. Could someone elaborate on that? Is that like asking for grants? How tough/competitive is that?

For junior faculty, it mainly involves writing grant proposals, which is a non-trivial exercise. For more senior scientists it means going up to Washington D.C. and doing hard core lobbying for more money on certain projects. For some projects, like telescopes, it's a matter of making friends with people with money and convincing them to give.

How tough it is depends on the season. Right now, everyone is cutting so it's a pain to get money for anything.
 
  • #33
Nspyred said:
...What about the "keeping funding coming" part. Could someone elaborate on that? Is that like asking for grants? How tough/competitive is that?

An example may be to get the funds needed to build a new telescope. If for some reason, they aren't available, it should be possible to find a lab that has similar equipment, in which case the equipment can be rented as needed. In all cases, one has to be imaginative enough to make the best of what is available. When enough researchers believe that non-existing equipment has to be built, they come together, and things get done.

Time spent on grant proposal by faculty members can easily take up 10-40% of their time. Naturally, a mature faculty member having many graduate students may put more care into this. The students do the actual research, while the professor can possibly spend his entire "research" time in his office (i.e. never in the lab) seeking funding, being there for his students only to answer questions and give out guide lines as needed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
20K