What Is The Root of 5? Irrational

[mymachine]

I wonder how do I find the root of 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, and so on?

And why the circle and the curve looks so smooth in the computer graphic software such as AutoCAD, Adobe Illustrator, etc., if the root is can not be found?

It should be looks rough.

Thank you

 

[DrewD]

I wonder how do I find the root of 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, and so on?

And why the circle and the curve looks so smooth in the computer graphic software such as AutoCAD, Adobe Illustrator, etc., if the root is can not be found?

It should be looks rough.

Thank you

What do you mean find the root of those numbers? Do you want an algorithm for finding square roots by hand?

What makes you think the root cannot be found? Are you worried because can't be written as a decimal or fraction to infinite precision? It can be approximated as close as you would like.

 

[mymachine]

If it be approximated, then the circle or curve in the computer graphic software should not looks smooth.

How do you approximate the root of 2,3,5,6,7,8,10, and so on?

By the numerical method?

 

[Number Nine]

If it be approximated, then the circle or curve in the computer graphic software should not looks smooth.

How do you approximate the root of 2,3,5,6,7,8,10, and so on?

By the numerical method?

Yes, you approximate them. What does that have to do with whether or not the graph "looks smooth"?

 

[Integral]

You have the equation:

x²-c=0 Where c is the number of your choice.

There are lots of numerical methods which can be used on this. The most basic is the bisection method. Just for example let c=6

let x = 1 plug that into the above expression to get -5, now let x = 3, plug that into the equation to get 3, since the first try was negative and the second positive we must have a zero between 1 and 3, cut the interval in half and try x=1.5. What is the sign? It will be either + or -, so you have narrowed the interval where the root lies. Continue this process until you achieve the accuracy you want.

 

[Borek]

While the decimal expansion of the \sqrt 2 is infinite, we have a perfectly valid and exact representation of the number - \sqrt 2.

And lines on the screen look nice because of antialiasing, not for any other reason. Yes, Bresenham's line algorithm or midpoint circle algorithm produce jagged lines, but they are rarely used these days.

 

[Floid]

And why the circle and the curve looks so smooth in the computer graphic software such as AutoCAD, Adobe Illustrator, etc., if the root is can not be found?

They look so smooth because your eye does not have infinite resolution. You have to remember no matter what your screen is made of discrete pixels so there is no such thing as a continuous curve on the screen, only the illusion of one. Multiple tricks are used to help that illusion out such as smoothing, shading, etc.

In my experience a 32 sided polygon works well for small circles. As you draw bigger and bigger circles you just add more and more sides.