What is the row and column expression for the tensor product in index notation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the expression for the tensor product of matrices in index notation, specifically seeking to understand the row and column indices for the resulting tensor product. Participants explore various aspects of tensor products, including their structure and notation, particularly in the context of square matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the tensor product of two matrices in index notation as ##(a \bigotimes b)_{ijkl} = a_{ij}b_{kl}## and seeks clarification on the row and column indices for this expression.
  • Another participant suggests that the Wikipedia article provides the answer, indicating that each entry ##a_{ij}## corresponds to a whole matrix ##b##, but acknowledges difficulty in understanding the index placement.
  • There is confusion about whether the tensor product of two 2x2 matrices should be treated as having 4 rows and columns or just 2, with one participant expressing uncertainty about the implications of this distinction.
  • Some participants discuss the representation of matrices in terms of sums of tensor products, suggesting that the resulting structure is a four-dimensional object, though the specifics of index placement remain unclear.
  • One participant proposes a method for determining row and column indices based on the indices of the matrices involved, suggesting a pattern of ##i+k## for rows and ##j+l## for columns, but this is not universally accepted.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of understanding tensors in terms of their properties rather than solely through coordinate representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the index notation for tensor products, with no consensus on a clear expression for row and column indices. Multiple competing views and interpretations are present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that their understanding of tensor products is still developing, and some express that the material is complex and beyond their current knowledge level. There is also mention of specific cases, such as square matrices, which may influence the discussion but are not fully resolved.

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2
We've been learning about tensor products. In particular, we've been looking at index notation for the tensor products of matrices like these:
##
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
a_{11} & a_{12} \\
a_{21} & a_{22} \end{array} \right)##
And
##
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
b_{11} & b_{12} \\
b_{21} & b_{22} \end{array} \right)##

In index notation the tensor product is ##(a \bigotimes b)_{ijkl} = a_{ij}b_{kl}##. And apparently, there's an expression in terms of these indices which tells you which row and which column ##a_{ij}b_{kl}## will be on. So I tried the row number being ##ik## and the column number being ##kl## and that worked up to the third row and column, then it didn't any more. I've written out the matrix and I've been staring at it, and I cannot see what the expression for row and column number is. Does anyone know it? I'd really appreciate someone showing me, because now it's going to bother me for ages. Thanks for any help! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kara386
Cutter Ketch said:
The Wikipedia article answers your question https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor_product. Basically at each aij location you get a whole b sized matrix of aijbkl.
If it does then I can't find it, or more probably I didn't understand it. In a normal matrix, of course, the row is just given by ##i## and the column by ##j## and there is an equivalent idea for tensors but it's not at all easy; I thought for the entry ##a_{ij}b_{kl}## it would be in row ##ik## and column ##jk## and it isn't; nor is it in row ##ikl## or row ##ijl## and I just can't find a general expression for the location of some element ##a_{ij}b_{kl}##. Sorry if it's obvious, I did read through the Wikipedia page but we started the tensor product a few days ago and most of what the article says is a bit beyond me.

I'm only really interested in square matrices, which I hoped would make things simpler. Not sure it does though!
 
Ah. Unless row and column in a tensor mean something different to in a matrix. Is the tensor product of two 2x2 matrix treated as having 4 rows and columns or just 2? I was treating it as having 4.
 
You can write each matrix ##A = (a_{kl}) = \Sigma_i \,v_i \otimes w_i\;##. So if ##B = (b_{mn}) = \Sigma_j \,v'_j \otimes w'_j## is another matrix, then ##A \otimes B = \Sigma_i \, \Sigma_j \, v_i \otimes w_i \otimes v'_j \otimes w'_j \,##. This is a four dimensional cube, a matrix of matrices, i.e. entries ##(a_{ij} \cdot B) = (a_{ij} \cdot (b_{mn}))\, ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kara386
fresh_42 said:
You can write each matrix ##A = (a_{kl}) = \Sigma_i \,v_i \otimes w_i\;##. So if ##B = (b_{mn}) = \Sigma_j \,v'_j \otimes w'_j## is another matrix, then ##A \otimes B = \Sigma_i \, \Sigma_j \, v_i \otimes w_i \otimes v'_j \otimes w'_j \,##. This is a four dimensional cube, a matrix of matrices, i.e. entries ##(a_{ij} \cdot B) = (a_{ij} \cdot (b_{mn}))\, ##.
Ah ok. Can I split it into parts? In the first quadrant, top left, the row and column are simply given by the indices of B. Then for the rest it's the ##i+k## for the row and ##j+l## for the column?
 
Top left is the matrix ##a_{11}\cdot B##, the ##a_{11}## multiple of the entire matrix ##B##.
Each entry is a multiple of the entire matrix ##B##, namely ##a_{ij}B##

The hierarchy goes:
grade 0 - scalars ##c##
grade 1 - vectors ##\vec{v}##
grade 2 - matrices ##\vec{v} \otimes \vec{w}##
grade 3 - cubes ##\vec{u}\otimes \vec{v}\otimes \vec{w}##
##\ldots##

However it rarely makes sense to think of tensors in such a coordinate representation.

It is far more helpful to think of them in terms of properties. E.g. a Lie multiplication in a Lie algebra ##\mathfrak{g}## can be written as
$$ [X,Y] = \sum_{i=1}^m \, u_i(X)\cdot v_i(Y) \cdot w_i \; \textrm{ and } \; u_i \otimes v_i \otimes w_i \in \mathfrak{g}^* \otimes \mathfrak{g}^* \otimes \mathfrak{g}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K