OK, this is more of a spot for an elaboration on a question I just posted in another thread. Not quite duplicating threads, I hope, I just wanted to have this not buried in another spot...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So, the question is this:

Let's say that we have a smooth manifold [tex]\mathcal{M}[/tex]that may be viewed as a surface in [tex]\mathbb{R}^3[/tex] given by an embedding [tex]x[/tex]. Denote by [tex]n[/tex] the outward-pointing unit normal to [tex]\mathcal{M}[/tex] (yes, we are assuming that [tex]\mathcal{M}[/tex] is orientable), and by [tex]g[/tex] and [tex]h[/tex] the metric and second fundamental form, resp., defined by

[tex]g_{ij}=\left<\dfrac{\partial x}{\partial u^i},\dfrac{\partial x}{\partial u^j}\right>[/tex]

[tex]h_{ij}=-\left<\dfrac{\partial^2x}{\partial u^i\partial u^j},n\right>[/tex]

with respect to some local coordinates [tex]\left\lbrace u^1,u^2\right\rbrace[/tex] for some (open) region of [tex]\mathcal{M}[/tex].

What I need to understand, basically, is how this notation works. I can easily see how one would obtain

[tex]g_{ij}=\dfrac{\partial y^k}{\partial u^i}\dfrac{\partial y^k}{\partial u^j};\hspace{0.75cm}k\text{ summed}[/tex]

from the definiton that [tex]g=g_{ij}du^i\otimes du^j[/tex], [tex]y^k=y^k\left(u^1,u^2\right)[/tex], but I don't see how to go from here to the pairing above, and am even more confused about the pairing used to define [tex]h_{ij}[/tex] above.

Any thoughts?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# What is the second fundamental form?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**